Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 12:30:32 -0500
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: "David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	Mankirat Singh <mankiratsingh1315@gmail.com>, pg@bowt.ie,
	andrew@dunslane.net, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: abi-compliance-check failure due to recent changes to
 pg_{clear,restore}_{attribute,relation}_stats()
Message-ID: <aPfDOD6F4FaJJd7M@nathan>
References: 
 <CAOtk82T=OO3e=SYPyHZq50wfyt569E6t=ee4b7va2y08M+a0SQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <F6567E02-23FD-455C-95D2-5CB076BC4E65@justatheory.com>
 <230647.1760971159@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <aPZnY0Icgw1RGaGP@nathan>
 <334460.1760980024@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <aPZt4b5beRPxjgI-@nathan>
 <aPZ_2a1EQvofxeci@nathan>
 <351026.1760988833@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <aPahAGpqBTtvX3YG@nathan>
 <1A5A7BE9-4A1B-4A1E-9182-02EBE9A54721@justatheory.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1A5A7BE9-4A1B-4A1E-9182-02EBE9A54721@justatheory.com>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/aPfDOD6F4FaJJd7M%40nathan>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 11:22:29PM +0200, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> I suggest mentioning that new entries should be at the top, that the list
> should be in reverse chronological order.

I felt that this was already covered in the existing commentary.

> Otherwise this looks great, love seeing it!

Thanks for looking.  Now that we have a new run from baza that appears to
be using the updated baseline, I've committed the remaining patches.

For the rest of the back-branches, I'm considering starting with a baseline
of the latest minor version stamps.  While it would be nice to have a
comprehensive history of the ABI compatibility for each major version,
we've lived this long without it, and I think it's unlikely that we'd act
on any breakages that predate the latest release set.  Thoughts?

-- 
nathan