Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 15:21:44 -0500
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: "David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>,
	Mankirat Singh <mankiratsingh1315@gmail.com>, pg@bowt.ie,
	andrew@dunslane.net, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: abi-compliance-check failure due to recent changes to
 pg_{clear,restore}_{attribute,relation}_stats()
Message-ID: <aPfrWJxUIOm1RH5A@nathan>
References: <230647.1760971159@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <aPZnY0Icgw1RGaGP@nathan>
 <334460.1760980024@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <aPZt4b5beRPxjgI-@nathan>
 <aPZ_2a1EQvofxeci@nathan>
 <351026.1760988833@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <aPahAGpqBTtvX3YG@nathan>
 <1A5A7BE9-4A1B-4A1E-9182-02EBE9A54721@justatheory.com>
 <aPfDOD6F4FaJJd7M@nathan>
 <655240.1761077617@sss.pgh.pa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <655240.1761077617@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/aPfrWJxUIOm1RH5A%40nathan>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 04:13:37PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I propose that we should make .abi-compliance-history point at these
> commits rather than REL_17_6 et al.  If there is anything later than
> this that affected ABI, it'd be worth finding out I think, even though
> we might choose not to do anything about it.  (In effect, we'd be
> starting the ABI compliance histories there rather than all the way
> back at the .0 releases.)

WFM.  I'll make it so.

I see that baza is currently using the latest tags for <v18.  David, will
it start using the .abi-compliance-history file on the rest of the
back-branches once it is added?

-- 
nathan