Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2026 14:05:14 -0600
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	Nitin Motiani <nitinmotiani@google.com>,
	Hannu Krosing <hannuk@google.com>,
	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade: transfer pg_largeobject_metadata's files when
 possible
Message-ID: <aY4yerlBoVSb1OId@nathan>
References: <qfp7z4c3m6bw53oky33halcdhomiijod6segzrhf757ijjvapr@e5rf4u5wnfmu>
 <aYTVAFTPelebVl6W@nathan>
 <nt56moqkh6yoerzw5cml6qu7m4mxu65vqtgdt3nbm5mhpg5hqt@4s5oa3sqhzub>
 <aYTwC8V50rPgw6GE@nathan>
 <t3zu4hyzwqws4puaqd2lhdlw7yp2ckgswuaaizmfi6seto3x4w@5exxg3kazkos>
 <aYT95PGdMvHHzwsP@nathan>
 <aYUL01ZYpDBaZ7qN@nathan>
 <jaqwqwwiy57bhg36jru4mvjznzemrhgobyynpqvyp573m7h3rt@2kpgm5sfkbyy>
 <aYkHiDrBRz2snwyn@nathan>
 <aYzuAz_ITUpd9ZvH@nathan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <aYzuAz_ITUpd9ZvH@nathan>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/aY4yerlBoVSb1OId%40nathan>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 03:00:51PM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> This was a little more painful than I expected, but this seems to be what
> is required to allow COPY-ing pg_largeobject_metadata during binary
> upgrades from < v12.

I don't think there's anything terribly controversial here, so I'd like to
proceed with committing this in the next couple of days if there are no
objections.

-- 
nathan