Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 12:42:28 -0600
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>,
	Zhang Mingli <zmlpostgres@gmail.com>,
	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG?] macOS (Intel) build =?utf-8?Q?w?=
 =?utf-8?Q?arnings=3A_=22ranlib=3A_file_?= =?utf-8?B?4oCm?= has no symbols"
 for aarch64 objects
Message-ID: <aYOTFLqyvvPUQLN8@nathan>
References: <b3e0930c-e86c-4a6e-8059-281424ca6d69@Spark>
 <229aaaf3-f529-44ed-8e50-00cb6909af21@Spark>
 <4df5af1a-8528-4f9f-9daf-ec069bd66f69@eisentraut.org>
 <1453046.1770218933@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <aYN5vmHb89m3sfgs@nathan>
 <1472307.1770229663@sss.pgh.pa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1472307.1770229663@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/aYOTFLqyvvPUQLN8%40nathan>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 01:27:43PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> The idea I'd had was to simply merge pg_popcount_aarch64.c
> and pg_popcount_x86.c into one file.  Since each one is basically
> one giant #ifdef block conditioned on a different symbol, they'd not
> interfere.  But I wouldn't propose this unless it made sense from
> a code-structure viewpoint, and I'm not sure it does.  It could
> make sense if there was some code that could be shared, but I'm
> not seeing much.

Yeah, even after the upcoming code simplification I'm working on, I'm not
sure that makes sense.

-- 
nathan