Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 07:04:40 +0000
From: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
To: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
	Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>,
	pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org,
	Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com>
Subject: Re: Flush some statistics within running transactions
Message-ID: <aZQTCJJm61J/X4nC@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal>
References: <aXnveIxQEB5wwcB8@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal>
 <CAA5RZ0tGhu9jXGgFjzx7yK4cseE+t40Q4qZ+KhY66B2MZ=pBrQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA5RZ0tvxZTZ7Xwm7FjWxAY_OphCq7tmpCaLgas0qrh+J86pRg@mail.gmail.com>
 <aYDb7g5hXnaP+5BU@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal>
 <CAA5RZ0tgr5iFuBDofX9n4SNbo-SFjzNFqTGHt7yQFAmfWBf-Rw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA5RZ0sqJzpBZnOY3rOy5x7+WL_UDnoMkn2S_ZoXPPOWZkXSbA@mail.gmail.com>
 <aYXL6XmVABORjGF5@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal>
 <CAA5RZ0tK=-Dukr4ofmKpPSK4-LwqrGXmzkqGoMuJKPXnGW3=AA@mail.gmail.com>
 <aZLVDJLTiFlxsWZi@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal>
 <CAA5RZ0tPsU_bCATn-Wtf8hMaKmrCwfxtLcY9Pp3NQPpLrH2G_Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAA5RZ0tPsU_bCATn-Wtf8hMaKmrCwfxtLcY9Pp3NQPpLrH2G_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/aZQTCJJm61J/X4nC%40ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal>
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On Mon, Feb 16, 2026 at 04:42:50PM -0600, Sami Imseih wrote:
> I do agree with what you did here by passing "is_partial" to the callbacks.
> Now it will be up to the callbacks to determine if they performed a partial
> or a complete flush ( even in the case of any anytime flush, if they so
> happened to flush stats for all the fields ).

Right.

> I do not have any further comments on this patchset.

Thanks for the review!

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com