Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 07:43:43 +0000
From: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
	Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>,
	Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
	pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: relfilenode statistics
Message-ID: <aa56L2wM16VldK5f@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal>
References: <aQ3X20hbqoThQXgp@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal>
 <aQ_TYhsZG72QkS_A@paquier.xyz>
 <aRGoGcOdutTHQfpn@paquier.xyz>
 <aRS9+yaGhjDslRWj@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal>
 <aUA3XkU9hc1xrtRB@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal>
 <ezbfcpjtfh3vtm667aegyrptcdsvinbuxw6y5p6j3e5fbffrl5@i7v6cjapz3yv>
 <aUELPdhdcyzTM_8K@paquier.xyz>
 <zferux2jlbhqymubzhpubfrkjzhzxzguq4eprtycojtif5vbqh@2t7cu2teyqmi>
 <aWYQXiKgIIvrlyVi@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal>
 <aZv2B8CFJZTKEl8j@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="sdA5zuaL94ts0rne"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <aZv2B8CFJZTKEl8j@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/aa56L2wM16VldK5f%40ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal>
Precedence: bulk


--sdA5zuaL94ts0rne
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi,

On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 06:39:03AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 09:29:02AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 10:39:15AM -0500, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > On 2025-12-16 16:33:17 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > 
> > Andres, Michael, let me try to sum up my understanding of the current state
> > and see how we could now move forward. 
> > 
> > First of all, I understand that you both think that the patch outcome will be
> > useful to have. The current debate is about the design, the current status is:
> > 
> > - Andres raised specific technical/implementation concerns and I've proposed
> > solutions in [1]. It also looks like Andres supports the overall design approach. 
> > - Michael is not really ok with the current design approach.
> > 
> > That means, that with the current design in place, Michael would probably not
> > commit it (even after review(s)).
> > 
> > Given that I'm also in favor of the current proposed design, this raises the
> > questions:
> > 
> > - Andres, would you commit such a patch (after review iteration(s) of course)?
> > - Michael, if Andres is ok with the above, would you still offer your help for the
> > review part (even if the design is not what you "prefer"/"like")?
> > 
> > [1]: https://postgr.es/m/aUEyzoOJtrCLAEeT%40ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
> 
> PFA, tiny rebase due to 9842e8aca09.

PFA, a new mandatory rebase.

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

--sdA5zuaL94ts0rne
Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename="v12-0001-Key-PGSTAT_KIND_RELATION-by-relfile-locator.patch"