Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l1GlP-0002x8-6j for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 22:43:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l1GlN-0000Lh-Uq for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 22:43:13 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l1GlN-0000La-La for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 22:43:13 +0000 Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.201]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l1GlG-0000MJ-AJ for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 22:43:12 +0000 X-Originating-IP: 79.88.149.14 Received: from [172.16.255.146] (14.149.88.79.rev.sfr.net [79.88.149.14]) (Authenticated sender: vik@postgresfriends.org) by relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 393011BF205; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 22:42:59 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table To: Surafel Temesgen Cc: Simon Riggs , Ryan Lambert , Masahiko Sawada , Michael Paquier , =?UTF-8?Q?R=c3=a9mi_Lapeyre?= , Eli Marmor , David Steele , PostgreSQL Hackers , Georgios References: <7764ee7b-bb28-63a3-0462-34b2d8a2e107@postgresfriends.org> From: Vik Fearing Message-ID: Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2021 23:42:59 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On 1/17/21 5:46 PM, Surafel Temesgen wrote: > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 10:12 PM Vik Fearing > wrote: > >> >> I haven't looked at this patch in a while, but I hope that ALTER TABLE t >> ADD SYSTEM VERSIONING is not adding any columns. That is a bug if it does. >> >> > Yes, that is how I implement it. I don't understand how it became a bug? This is not good, and I see that DROP SYSTEM VERSIONING also removes these columns which is even worse. Please read the standard that you are trying to implement! I will do a more thorough review of the functionalities in this patch (not necessarily the code) this week. -- Vik Fearing