Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 14:20:08 -0500
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
	David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>, Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>,
	Jeremy Schneider <schneider@ardentperf.com>,
	pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: another autovacuum scheduling thread
Message-ID: <abMR6MQGQyyKWep4@nathan>
References: 
 <CA+TgmoaAgv5D6u+_4KKqQFGH1n+jsFZ1mFWh+CSGqDUtyBNsXg@mail.gmail.com>
 <aam3dmZcia95-vB6@nathan>
 <abAzhNqs5F8sJDdm@nathan>
 <abBEiOICOdbbhsEI@nathan>
 <CAA5RZ0seLxDmH9UftUA3vS8DrW+7T9HV5XK8yAuQxA8BaRkg2g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA5RZ0vfhAnFBp4HrBQc+ALaJMx6vCvMtnBi39ST_4nH9PZEjA@mail.gmail.com>
 <abGP87A3JPIXDG2I@nathan>
 <CAA5RZ0tWonKY=E5U51i-J8s2EcRoLqtUQyWv+pQ4_rjFKSn+AA@mail.gmail.com>
 <abGmNAVIPSqX124E@nathan>
 <CAA5RZ0sZE-gfJ0c9HJkOk9XeFQwZL2wuJwrtOX+ZfUBLDcpFMA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAA5RZ0sZE-gfJ0c9HJkOk9XeFQwZL2wuJwrtOX+ZfUBLDcpFMA@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/abMR6MQGQyyKWep4%40nathan>
Precedence: bulk

I'm debating whether I should move forward with committing this [0] for
v19.  On one hand, I think I've addressed all the latest feedback, and I'm
not aware of any sustained objections to the approach.  But on the other
hand, there hasn't been much discussion since November (my fault), and I
can't quite tell if this patch has enough support.  At the moment, I'm
leaning towards committing it, but I'm curious what folks think.

[0] https://postgr.es/m/attachment/191721/v11-0001-autovacuum-scheduling-improvements.patch

-- 
nathan