Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2026 12:41:34 -0400
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
	=?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>,
	Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>,
	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: PG 19 release notes and authors
Message-ID: <adPiPgMEwNMaB3wk@momjian.us>
References: <adJn3nBX13YYRBJP@momjian.us>
 <202604051405.sxedzcgzky3n@alvherre.pgsql>
 <xgwkagej6rzkxg235ol4vzq3dljvaumzk3lhfecld4hogl4od5@mq6jaccjoxvz>
 <CA+Tgmob_tz0+T1CcyTFwgQVThsoezY2fKib=r+ukAvVBXwM1gg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+Tgmob_tz0+T1CcyTFwgQVThsoezY2fKib=r+ukAvVBXwM1gg@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/adPiPgMEwNMaB3wk%40momjian.us>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Apr  6, 2026 at 11:38:41AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2026 at 10:51 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > On 2026-04-05 16:09:57 +0200, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > On 2026-Apr-05, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > I just updated the wiki to handle this case because obviously
> > > > Co-authored-by is listing more than just committers:
> > > >
> > > >     https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Commit_Message_Guidance#Tags%3A_%22%3A%22
> > > >     Used to indicate the patch authors. "Co-authored-by:" should list
> > > >     individuals who modified the patch but should not be listed as
> > > >     authors in the release notes.
> >
> > I think that is a completely unwarranted change for which there is zero
> > concensus.
> 
> +1. This whole discussion is crazy to me. Every Author and Co-Author
> should be listed in the release notes. If there is no author or
> co-author named in the commit message, then the committer should be
> listed as the sole author; otherwise, the exact list of authors and
> co-authors that the committer chose to include in the commit message
> should be credited. This wiki update should never have happened, and
> should be reverted immediately. I don't even understand why we're
> talking about this. You've invented a distinction between Author and
> Co-authored-by that not a single committer seems to have ever
> intended. It's just a way to indicate that some people did more work
> than others, not that the co-authors do not have an authorship
> interest. If they weren't supposed to be listed as authors, they would
> have been listed as Reviewed-by or not at all.

Uh, the original wiki text is from a discussion on
pgsql-private-committers@lists.postgresql.org with subject "determining
the primary author of a commit" that happened around November 2024 to
March 2025.  Unfortunatly there is no public archive of that
discussion.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.