Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wEqI8-004TIH-0E for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 15:12:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wEqI6-003a8I-37 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 15:12:02 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wEqI6-003a8A-26 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 15:12:02 +0000 Received: from fout-a3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.146]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wEqI4-00000001wPw-1lHG for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 15:12:01 +0000 Received: from phl-compute-04.internal (phl-compute-04.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D247EC01B3; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 11:11:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-03 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-04.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 20 Apr 2026 11:11:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1776697919; x=1776784319; bh=E VBuNEiGp6kZw7JyOx1Qc9zLuKynIlBZe0+P/B3tsLU=; b=rcI6FFbh1tpuGepU5 LOPwprIYxpUCzIXf7jVFUiCFqFogNhMXkngdj/CftwbBzgNxo3yrK+78tWMUEtNf jb0SIbnrBPOtZiUiBT7sbAliC9CjVdneeUlnIX/E3RursHxfXXxS3m1bJL7UqzJx HVwCQhhxswli+OjnzNkyYK3/17rpp64Uk7dD1VbAR1XcGugu1wD+V1dSCjPLtdw3 iezxbqyatryIL0K2ft/lK+etXomdwmE2XecZjDss8KDeTMDJcf4iOnKWowVQZIli sodsvbjm/67qA1IvEnLU6+sbWqLcHVWpkDWI3R9Cxmec8fBfMbYm3CCBZ8oDJffZ HgwQA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefhedrtddtgdehkeekhecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjug hrpeffhffvvefukfggtggugfgjsehtkeertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpeetlhhvrghrohcu jfgvrhhrvghrrgcuoegrlhhvhhgvrhhrvgesrghlvhhhrdhnohdqihhprdhorhhgqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvkedtffduffdtffffheffhfejjefhgfeiueeukeejkeffgfdu fffhudffffeuveenucffohhmrghinhepvghnthgvrhhprhhishgvuggsrdgtohhmnecuve hluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlvhhhvghr rhgvsegrlhhvhhdrnhhoqdhiphdrohhrghdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepuddtpdhmohguvg epshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopegrnhgurhgvshesrghnrghrrgiivghlrdguvgdp rhgtphhtthhopegrhhestgihsggvrhhtvggtrdgrthdprhgtphhtthhopegrmhhithdrkh grphhilhgrudeisehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepsghovghkvgifuhhrmhdo phhoshhtghhrvghssehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepmhhihhgrihhlnhhikh grlhgrhigvuhesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehsrhhinhgrthhhvddufeef sehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepphhgshhqlhdqhhgrtghkvghrsheslhhish htshdrphhoshhtghhrvghsqhhlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepthhglhesshhsshdrphhg hhdrphgrrdhushdprhgtphhtthhopehprhihiigshiesthgvlhhsrghsohhfthdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: ia2694551:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 11:11:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ida.kurilemu.internal (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 91ECFB03192; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 17:11:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 17:11:56 +0200 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Tom Lane Cc: Antonin Houska , Justin Pryzby , Mihail Nikalayeu , Andres Freund , Amit Kapila , Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla , Matthias van de Meent , pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Robert Treat Subject: Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently] Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <260901.1776696126@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On 2026-Apr-20, Tom Lane wrote: > So what you're saying is that the core regression tests will now fail > with wal_level=minimal? I don't see how that can possibly be > considered acceptable from a global standpoint; we might as well > remove wal_level=minimal, because it will never again get tested. Hmm, you're right, this was brain fade on my part. It surprising though that no buildfarm animal so far has complained. But I remember there's at least one that runs with that, per be142fa008ad. > I think you need to move these tests out into some other test suite > (or make a new one). I'll see what I can find. -- Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/