Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nYDTp-0000rO-78 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 20:57:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nYDTo-0007nn-2S for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 20:57:48 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nYDTn-0007nd-PJ for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 20:57:47 +0000 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nYDTk-0003tn-Vl for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 20:57:47 +0000 Received: (Authenticated sender: adsend@dunslane.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD44A60002; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 20:57:41 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2022 16:57:39 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Subject: Re: Why is lorikeet so unstable in v14 branch only? Content-Language: en-US To: Andres Freund , Tom Lane Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org References: <136102.1648320427@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20220326194948.mksfw6z3fysojpxx@alap3.anarazel.de> From: Andrew Dunstan In-Reply-To: <20220326194948.mksfw6z3fysojpxx@alap3.anarazel.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On 3/26/22 15:49, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2022-03-26 14:47:07 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I chanced to notice that buildfarm member lorikeet has been >> failing an awful lot lately in the v14 branch, but hardly >> at all in other branches. Here's a log extract from its >> latest run [1]: > One interesting bit in the config is: > > 'extra_config' => { > ... > 'HEAD' => [ > 'update_process_title = off' > ], > 'REL_13_STABLE' => [ > 'update_process_title = off' > ] > I'd forgotten about that. Let me do that for REL_14_STABLE and see where we get to. >> *** starting debugger for pid 53762, tid 10536 >> 2022-03-26 06:32:02.158 EDT [623eeb6c.d0c2:4] LOG: server process (PID 53762) exited with exit code 127 >> 2022-03-26 06:32:02.158 EDT [623eeb6c.d0c2:5] DETAIL: Failed process was running: create table mlparted_tab_part1 partition of mlparted_tab for values in (1); >> 2022-03-26 06:32:02.158 EDT [623eeb6c.d0c2:6] LOG: terminating any other active server processes > I wonder what where the output of "starting debugger for pid 53762" ends up? I > assume it's triggered by > 'CYGWIN' => 'server error_start=c:\\ncygwin64\\bin\\dumper.exe -d %1 %2', > > https://cygwin.org/cygwin-ug-net/using-cygwinenv.html > says "The filename of the executing program and it's Windows process id are appended to the command as arguments. " > > but nothing about %1 and %2 :(. I those are just "executing program" and > "Windows process id" respectively? I don't remember where I got this invocation from. But see for example cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com