Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 17:09:00 -0500
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90@gmail.com>,
	Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: pgindent versus struct members and typedefs
Message-ID: <agOk_PheI2Rtb0kT@nathan>
References: <509793.1764715875@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <afplW8DvRONDc1yl@nathan>
 <729177.1778039019@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <aftTyjC_xWp-n30S@nathan>
 <771696.1778079755@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <afta-6zVawsxlt1v@nathan>
 <773076.1778080637@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <aftcOkcXCeFKmZbH@nathan>
 <aftooa3UABE3AuZf@nathan>
 <94060.1778621630@sss.pgh.pa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <94060.1778621630@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/agOk_PheI2Rtb0kT%40nathan>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 05:33:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes:
>> Here's a new version of 0001 with a cleaned-up commit message.  I've
>> omitted 0002, since it's just the result of running pgindent after apply
>> the first one.
> 
> I think we're about ready to roll on doing the pgindent run.
> Do you want to push your patch tomorrow AM, and then I'll get
> on with the rest?

Sounds good.  We won't be back-patching any of this, right?

-- 
nathan