public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
To: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: John Naylor <[email protected]>
Cc: Postgres hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Re-add recently-removed tests for ltree and intarray
Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 13:59:35 +0900
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<CANWCAZZTa8oVUvUN_-ueySDRjCqNNWAr5Mb4D2ARbmA2LiBPAw@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 10:49:38PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> John Naylor <[email protected]> writes:
>> FWIW, I tried to reproduce with the former new tests un-reverted, and
>> didn't see stack overflow on the following, so unless I fat-fingered
>> that I wonder if there's something more specific on the previously
>> failing members:
>
>> ppc64le / gcc 8.5 / Linux kernel 4.18
>> S390X / gcc 13.3 / Linux kernel 6.8
>
> Hm, did you use -O0 ?
Yeah, that should matter. I don't immediately see why the new tests
should fail at hand.. And unfortunately I don't have these
environments at hand to double-check things, so I think that I am
going to take a bet on HEAD. Then if things work, do a backpatch.
--
Michael
Attachments:
[application/pgp-signature] signature.asc (833B, 2-signature.asc)
download
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Re-add recently-removed tests for ltree and intarray
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox