Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wRkse-002eym-09 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 26 May 2026 06:03:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wRksc-003KEB-07 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 26 May 2026 06:03:06 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wRksW-003KE3-1z for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 26 May 2026 06:03:06 +0000 Received: from fout-b6-smtp.messagingengine.com ([202.12.124.149]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wRksU-00000001THn-3p5b for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 26 May 2026 06:03:01 +0000 Received: from phl-compute-04.internal (phl-compute-04.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailfout.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691381D0006E; Tue, 26 May 2026 02:02:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-03 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-04.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 26 May 2026 02:02:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paquier.xyz; h= cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1779775376; x=1779861776; bh=aiDjOTzwq7 TXqCVtzYl2gxenRtMI/1JGkI4kpEmrVKo=; b=ShrGOLdfcr//ZksroFwcuvxRRR XeGwPN/7bhvbsHnWr9RDO/oComqoKbjqIAUIiX66Z4wEq777KftJIPDaFPGFl98u IZRCk5gEsJQlh5+KgBXNW8jSstnECep/RitbYH0NtyK2jEKOLKpnFL/SGQVtgaDj q9uq6b/xATsZ0JnYUGwRdCiz1iDOGg/jR6WeehZzT+PZxonKvdfJlYkPdm93SV7Q JWxeVryeOuYf0wo+BjPshQdTOfgc/79qU72WW8DN6jYZB3fRDGrJqe/Be20B4WXl 1ZYYEY3HYTWFVaRKZjYmrkb9DKSyqa7nccafd9GOAs8B/rKEEdCR7YNYaAFA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1779775376; x=1779861776; bh=aiDjOTzwq7TXqCVtzYl2gxenRtMI/1JGkI4 kpEmrVKo=; b=pJrXJCpD0/y9MPgeCxPP0PJmHIvIAWngB19uV7TpsGojN7l67Xb u4DNlXGiN2HmUisrDiyNv6H+2R6xmjDopdYn9cwQzo68EvoijK+8h9PHmgJkY1mh 95l6c7JvL4g4wo5uuS44TqdhdPJZvZeGMmDJJ6yGGWyXav0V6zNV2CTuaNRhi1rA x+4ZmZR7Dw4sbJ7PdHySmvWBAbR6nFmk8wZGG5Ts56tOnHBZnpwls7/T68eZr910 T4B2Z5u75LjsdBG4+NiELQt6P3yfLsq00+IhRivtiYZrXRjX/X/AN1uwpGxfK/jS 0avbRijE8tE8XfVx3QCzyqI5HdlgP8hOlzw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: dmFkZTEEKqASFrW6mNSkw6plbhZEdpWUQwOkxdvgNuSk5ICcw+Oc6IOCuc2mOCar4VbGJr 4vDLVG9eR9J4/n9Xr8XVenNWbRqOuACYheyNoyr9ch9GsqaxWmQzkw69sYyZj8fLr0DHQv DWEYy3Ki3BDPJCXZd372kFOWXwhrrKipptgRQcGVIMOVyWuBSLXmRzsIjnVgnJWmqDMbU6 WWf8sw5x2LfWnexnkPibQaknxtkXOy/tz8FEa4gE1Athlz9gHEB4J59A9396NH6xzQ6byQ 4Y7QEV/Pw6dKS+/AFuItMWVxO9wFlQY+m7ChJWU7+eVE0MST+fTTGkXu79vU09M8m014qP T6TalF+xTiuS51JT/D162rPO21a6xCCeU9Fzr/PS1z1H1QGXQ98KUDM16THxZ/YH0+Pvl2 JYdL0ANRgVMPCLf3DAPxN5xyMv0Dqh0ugFXJtkz8g8igl11XREmaEahmAoVQWDDNd0+G/Z u81pljFAeVipt38lMVkNU8qYcBc/r1L0hCoQCvVWrA8C2KbG5aXh1ui8tEzySXOnueMryE LVpEaRCr4nHGUqXtBbT6+AVF7Tqk4KZ5dXZ8DeqsuP0BWPTYlKDTp7Rk+BnA8NuwvpSjt/ xRQV9EKYXNZBzNW4Cbuh2SDpqWkTIPouiGlr39wDmRAtLYgO2Fsr0+ScaiOQ X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i0fe9450f:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 26 May 2026 02:02:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 15:02:50 +0900 From: Michael Paquier To: Daniel Gustafsson Cc: Tom Lane , PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and OpenSSL 4.0.0 Message-ID: References: <066B07BB-85FA-487C-BE8C-40F791CFC3C4@yesql.se> <65C5DC15-DE27-4D36-8AEE-A854C23B3834@yesql.se> <898414.1778192534@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1A5104C0-E9EF-4D90-9627-23D3D909104B@yesql.se> <95045A62-9A81-4AD8-BA25-D8648BD68499@yesql.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2p4s1ZvMuqyx8tQk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --2p4s1ZvMuqyx8tQk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 02:18:08PM -0700, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > On 8 May 2026, at 00:21, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >=20 > > I think the changes are straightforward enough that we can go ahead wit= h them. > > I'll re-test and re-post a new patchset for all branches once the minor= s ship. >=20 > Attached are rebased versions of this patchset for v14-master. I have a question here. Most of the changes relate to the use of const where the OpenSSL APIs require these to be so, but why is this a new requirement for 4.0? I can see that for most of the upstream routines, the const changes are much older, like in 8cc86b81ac20 for X509_NAME_get_text_by_NID() applying down to branch openssl-3.0. -- Michael --2p4s1ZvMuqyx8tQk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAmoVN4oACgkQnvQgOdby QH30lg//QM4z+JO53zxA4FTQ6OFFht0N/zp/4155Sw8OUthguAwV2EeQ6Rf7+irw uS6eXSH5kxdHnGCuMQ/ddWvVNmS0AEj+T7zfVeRHv4Li7ZWCQ1SiQ8jiXdnNTqqZ 3g2SXKjMynpEjS+NXYcOkWupHRYaDT9njuKOtqI6k0LuOu5qqqkd6fnacItdGVxt GDQoedNI4uGj5VlfMWXCxDD7Zqfrb0KdYF1ihKMsUQSj5DvSe6uF3q+G9EfWeDBe r6ox8LuLyF+iY75uuG+dykzZmJoo6cEvzPrLT4atyan+hBqxZIxbqplI29vW4J91 Hvai7vMuQRWgKUxzpAp9EiCf1aj/H1LGK27k2qejhzi1Ch2vQJOqaPXJMtN5KKL8 aJeW2hoRZ9/mELVaz+vRE+Fr/Xt2+kzffyVOYe3g2QV/lptZmN/VI2WsPnFy8Sl/ 2UiyFD8G+VoaSq4aJAdxRxPcv+UGivTLEcNmU+Yw9V65ffxBVuchm+51fr2Sd0QE U7mGIotdoJqHOqireMdwCvidEtbvSqjrB4fDjMmNM9QqvCVncgH8PjXyomqDzDSx 3BETWehRWAtzvspJyYjbgORpqBuV/BmARYdNby4UAzppWHdCleJdBcp9qReEP9Q2 B/cLa/db8+Ye2sOEkbnHhz2HEAt2udLsfAyxpmCOLiC+BqnUmX4= =e0UM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2p4s1ZvMuqyx8tQk--