Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 09:08:50 +0000
From: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>,
	Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
	Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>,
	Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>,
	Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>,
	Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>,
	Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Fix unqualified catalog references in psql describe queries
Message-ID: <aifYIhmiqNr9mf6f@bdtpg>
References: <C809E3C7-2437-486E-B626-0BE5F40BBB6C@gmail.com>
 <aie76hpKavQ9nAqd@paquier.xyz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <aie76hpKavQ9nAqd@paquier.xyz>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/aifYIhmiqNr9mf6f%40bdtpg>
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On Tue, Jun 09, 2026 at 04:08:26PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2026 at 04:46:46PM +0800, Chao Li wrote:
> > This is not a big problem, but it provides a way to pollute the
> > result of \dRs+ by adding a fake pg_foreign_server earlier in
> > search_path.
> 
> Which is always annoying..  Will fix and double-check later, thanks.

Now I wonder if we shoud not "protect" the operators too. They could also
lead to wrong results (if not worst).

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com