public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Álvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
To: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: Bertrand Drouvot <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
Cc: Chao Li <[email protected]>
Cc: L. pgsql-hackers <[email protected]>
Cc: Fujii Masao <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Cc: Jeff Davis <[email protected]>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <[email protected]>
Cc: Amit Kapila <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Fix unqualified catalog references in psql describe queries
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 19:08:22 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 2026-Jun-10, Tom Lane wrote:

> =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro_Herrera?= <[email protected]> writes:
> > I think we should just ditch the idea that operators live in schemas.
> 
> How would you do that without removing user-defined operators
> altogether?  (And thereby breaking most extensions.)

My proposal would be that all operators, both system-defined as well as
user-defined, live in a single namespace -- not that we forbid them from
being created.  I expect extensions mostly create operators for the data
types they themselves define, not for existing system datatypes.

I think the idea of public.=(int,int) being different from
pg_catalog.=(int,int) is just too dangerous and trips people up without
giving much valuable functionality.  If the extension offers
=(complex,complex) then that's fine: we would still have overloading per
the type system.

I may be missing something though.  Care to point out what it is?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera               48°01'N 7°57'E  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"El que vive para el futuro es un iluso, y el que vive para el pasado,
un imbécil" (Luis Adler, "Los tripulantes de la noche")





view thread (14+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Fix unqualified catalog references in psql describe queries
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox