Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1izNag-0006rs-Oc for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 16:31:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1izNae-0007VK-F4 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 16:31:48 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1izNae-0007Ro-2q for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 16:31:48 +0000 Received: from courriel.mines-paristech.fr ([77.158.173.149] helo=antispam-1.ensmp.fr) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1izNaa-0000WV-VE for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 16:31:46 +0000 Received: from smtp-5.mines-paristech.fr (smtp.mines-paristech.fr [77.158.173.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by antispam-1.ensmp.fr (antispam.mines-paristech.fr) with ESMTPS id AE2A455EEA; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 17:31:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from pseudo (195.237.219.88.rev.sfr.net [88.219.237.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-5.mines-paristech.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E979520077; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 17:31:40 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 17:31:38 +0100 (CET) From: Fabien COELHO X-X-Sender: fabien@pseudo To: Michael Paquier cc: Ian Barwick , Tom Lane , Daniel Gustafsson , Vik Fearing , PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: Add %x to PROMPT1 and PROMPT2 In-Reply-To: <20200204082036.GA94169@paquier.xyz> Message-ID: References: <09502c40-cfe1-bb29-10f9-4b3fa7b2bbb2@2ndquadrant.com> <13bc9081-2cf8-bf99-bedb-ce70c82bebc8@2ndquadrant.com> <20200203070807.GD2180@paquier.xyz> <5E008326-2335-4FB2-8513-D9018EC94F02@yesql.se> <6749.1580740801@sss.pgh.pa.us> <79ac1ca0-2bab-bbe4-126a-01966f812075@2ndquadrant.com> <20200204082036.GA94169@paquier.xyz> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-CLAMAV-SCAN: ok X-VRSPAM-SCORE: -100 X-VRSPAM-STATE: legit X-VRSPAM-CAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrhedugdekkecutefuodetggdotefrucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffujgfkfhgfgggtsehttdertddtredvnecuhfhrohhmpefhrggsihgvnhcuvefqgffnjffquceotghovghlhhhosegtrhhirdgvnhhsmhhprdhfrheqnecukfhppeekkedrvdduledrvdefjedrudelheenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuth X-VRSPAM-EXTCAUSE: mhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhht List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk >> +1 one for this change, it's something I also add to every .psqlrc I setup. > > So.. We have: > +1: Vik, Ian, Daniel, Alvaro, Christoph > +-0: Tom (?), Fabien (?) I did not know I had a vote. I'm "+1" on this change, if that matters. Just this morning I had a case where I wished I had the current transaction status under the eye under psql. > -1: Michael P. > > So there is a clear majority in favor of changing the default. Any > extra opinions from others? -- Fabien.