Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 07:23:37 +0200 (CEST)
From: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
In-Reply-To: <8691.1586798003@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2004140714090.27777@pseudo>
References: <8691.1586798003@sss.pgh.pa.us>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 BOUNDARY="2056645051-1820261243-1586841574=:27777"
Content-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2004140720320.27777@pseudo>
Precedence: bulk

  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

--2056645051-1820261243-1586841574=:27777
Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=ISO-8859-15; FORMAT=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Content-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2004140720321.27777@pseudo>


Hello Tom,

> Before I spend more time on this, I want to make sure that people
> are happy with this line of attack.

+1

I like it this way, because the structure is quite readable, which is the 
point.

My 0.02¤:

Maybe column heander "Example Result" should be simply "Result", because 
it is already on the same line as "Example" on its left, and "Example | 
Example Result" looks redundant.

Maybe the signature and description lines could be exchanged: I'm more 
interested and the description first, and the signature just above the 
example would make sense.

I'm wondering whether the function/operator name should be vertically 
centered in its cell? I'd left it left justified.

-- 
Fabien.
--2056645051-1820261243-1586841574=:27777--