Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1jxOfV-0002xs-Ga
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 05:48:53 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1jxOfU-0000S1-4C
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 05:48:52 +0000
Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
	id 1jxOfT-0000Rp-TZ
	for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 05:48:51 +0000
Received: from courriel-2.mines-paristech.fr ([77.158.173.19]
 helo=antispam-1.ensmp.fr)
	by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
	id 1jxOfP-0002f0-9n
	for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 05:48:50 +0000
Received: from smtp-5.mines-paristech.fr (smtp.mines-paristech.fr
 [77.158.173.146])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by antispam-1.ensmp.fr (antispam.mines-paristech.fr) with ESMTPS id
 72EA755F83;
	Mon, 20 Jul 2020 07:48:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pseudo.home (lfbn-ren-1-797-115.w83-197.abo.wanadoo.fr
 [83.197.123.115])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp-5.mines-paristech.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3FCF32025C;
	Mon, 20 Jul 2020 07:48:43 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 07:48:42 +0200 (CEST)
From: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
X-X-Sender: fabien@pseudo
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
    Daniel Verite <daniel@manitou-mail.org>,
    Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
 vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>,
    Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>,
    Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>,
    "Iwata, Aya" <iwata.aya@jp.fujitsu.com>,
    PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: psql - add SHOW_ALL_RESULTS option
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+hUKGJo1PYkW-oxzADaXDKoEUpoHonnSq4=1cUSNyOxc53Nmg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2007200747040.2368970@pseudo>
References: <325.1579288226@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <ba06d046-d286-46ab-92a3-a9fdf6a6df1b@manitou-mail.org>
 <20200201120136.fnlbfcrybgzk75pc@development>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.2002020906030.20752@pseudo>
 <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2006061622300.32228@pseudo>
 <CA+hUKGJo1PYkW-oxzADaXDKoEUpoHonnSq4=1cUSNyOxc53Nmg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-CLAMAV-SCAN: ok
X-VRSPAM-SCORE: -100
X-VRSPAM-STATE: legit
X-VRSPAM-CAUSE: 
 gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrgedvgddutddtucetufdoteggodetrfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvufgjkfhffgggtgesthdtredttdervdenucfhrhhomhephfgrsghivghnucevqffgnffjqfcuoegtohgvlhhhohestghrihdrvghnshhmphdrfhhrqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeevfefguefhgeefffeuleejfeejvefgffelveelkefgudeifedtgfduffelvdejieenucfkphepkeefrdduleejrdduvdefrdduudehnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhht
X-VRSPAM-EXTCAUSE: mhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhht
List-Id: <pgsql-hackers.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-hackers>
Precedence: bulk


>> In the meantime, here is a v9 which also fixes the behavior when using
>> \watch, so that now one can issue several \;-separated queries and have
>> their progress shown. I just needed that a few days ago and was
>> disappointed but unsurprised that it did not work.
>
> This seems to break the 013_crash_restart.pl test.

Yes, indeed. I'm planning to investigate, hopefully this week.

-- 
Fabien.