Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n2Tc3-00021y-BG for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 07:43:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n2Tc2-0005NS-64 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 07:43:06 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n2Tc1-0005NJ-To for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 07:43:05 +0000 Received: from sfr-1.cri.mines-paristech.fr ([77.158.180.225] helo=smtp.cri.ensmp.fr) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n2Tby-0006Uq-Ey for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 07:43:04 +0000 Received: from pc32.home (alyon-553-1-20-29.w92-129.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.129.118.29]) by smtp.cri.ensmp.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF29EC0220; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 08:45:54 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 08:42:53 +0100 (CET) From: Fabien COELHO X-X-Sender: fabien@pseudo To: Peter Eisentraut cc: "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" Subject: Re: psql - add SHOW_ALL_RESULTS option In-Reply-To: <10906444-d995-0a34-bb22-faf6d9f07f92@enterprisedb.com> Message-ID: References: <69C0B369-570C-4524-8EE4-BCCACECB6BEE@amazon.com> <20210412193301.GA11204@alvherre.pgsql> <3738387.1618451507@sss.pgh.pa.us> <451a2111-3757-c511-9413-8f8af531a167@enterprisedb.com> <18c78a01-4a34-9dd4-f78b-6860f1420c8e@enterprisedb.com> <6954328d-96f2-77f7-735f-7ce493a40949@enterprisedb.com> <2570e2ae-fa0f-aac9-f72f-bb59a9983a20@enterprisedb.com> <10906444-d995-0a34-bb22-faf6d9f07f92@enterprisedb.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk >> [...] > > I agree that these two behaviors in libpq are dubious, especially the > second one. I want to spend some time analyzing this more and see if > fixes in libpq might be appropriate. Ok. My analysis is that fixing libpq behavior is not in the scope of a psql patch, and that if I was to do that it was sure delay the patch even further. Also these issues/features are corner cases that provably very few people bumped into. -- Fabien.