Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jYrL6-0003gK-Um for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 13 May 2020 13:22:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jYrL5-0007g9-QN for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 13 May 2020 13:22:23 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jYrL5-0007g1-JV for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 13 May 2020 13:22:23 +0000 Received: from oss.nttdata.com ([49.212.34.109]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jYrL0-0006ND-IN for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 13 May 2020 13:22:22 +0000 Received: from hnk.local (p2358024-ipbf2221funabasi.chiba.ocn.ne.jp [114.177.56.24]) by oss.nttdata.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B05AC6007F; Wed, 13 May 2020 22:22:12 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.2 at oss.nttdata.com Subject: Re: SLRU statistics To: Tomas Vondra Cc: Alvaro Herrera , Masahiko Sawada , "tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com" , "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" References: <20200402004136.wodwftan45mcwggm@development> <20200430181901.24tlriahmafi4sfn@development> <0e1c8904-13be-ab70-0096-54f0b30e43ba@oss.nttdata.com> <20200502000818.nn4kpewiput42bnb@development> <49b8ad17-f6d9-a086-a952-ff1fec3ac1b3@oss.nttdata.com> <20200502105500.hwhba3d6s3hlrqf6@development> <20200502165905.brfxv6dk5vjdbgti@development> <976bbb73-a112-de3c-c488-b34b64609793@oss.nttdata.com> <20200513082159.myflgcs5fnhnujbk@development> From: Fujii Masao Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 22:22:12 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200513082159.myflgcs5fnhnujbk@development> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On 2020/05/13 17:21, Tomas Vondra wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 04:10:30PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: >> >> >> On 2020/05/07 13:47, Fujii Masao wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 2020/05/03 1:59, Tomas Vondra wrote: >>>> On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 12:55:00PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote: >>>>> On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 03:56:07PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> ... >>>>> >>>>>>>> Another thing I found is; pgstat_send_slru() should be called also by >>>>>>>> other processes than backend? For example, since clog data is flushed >>>>>>>> basically by checkpointer, checkpointer seems to need to send slru stats. >>>>>>>> Otherwise, pg_stat_slru.flushes would not be updated. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hmmm, that's a good point. If I understand the issue correctly, the >>>>>>> checkpointer accumulates the stats but never really sends them because >>>>>>> it never calls pgstat_report_stat/pgstat_send_slru. That's only called >>>>>>> from PostgresMain, but not from CheckpointerMain. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes. >>>>>> >>>>>>> I think we could simply add pgstat_send_slru() right after the existing >>>>>>> call in CheckpointerMain, right? >>>>>> >>>>>> Checkpointer sends off activity statistics to the stats collector in >>>>>> two places, by calling pgstat_send_bgwriter(). What about calling >>>>>> pgstat_send_slru() just after pgstat_send_bgwriter()? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yep, that's what I proposed. >>>>> >>>>>> In previous email, I mentioned checkpointer just as an example. >>>>>> So probably we need to investigate what process should send slru stats, >>>>>> other than checkpointer. I guess that at least autovacuum worker, >>>>>> logical replication walsender and parallel query worker (maybe this has >>>>>> been already covered by parallel query some mechanisms. Sorry I've >>>>>> not checked that) would need to send its slru stats. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Probably. Do you have any other process type in mind? >>> >>> No. For now what I'm in mind are just checkpointer, autovacuum worker, >>> logical replication walsender and parallel query worker. Seems logical >>> replication worker and syncer have sent slru stats via pgstat_report_stat(). >>> >>>> I've looked at places calling pgstat_send_* functions, and I found >>>> thsese places: >>>> >>>> src/backend/postmaster/bgwriter.c >>>> >>>> - AFAIK it merely writes out dirty shared buffers, so likely irrelevant. >>>> >>>> src/backend/postmaster/checkpointer.c >>>> >>>> - This is what we're already discussing here. >>>> >>>> src/backend/postmaster/pgarch.c >>>> >>>> - Seems irrelevant. >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm a bit puzzled why we're not sending any stats from walsender, which >>>> I suppose could do various stuff during logical decoding. >>> >>> Not sure why, but that seems an oversight... >>> >>> >>> Also I found another minor issue; SLRUStats has not been initialized to 0 >>> and which could update the counters unexpectedly. Attached patch fixes >>> this issue. >> >> This is minor issue, but basically it's better to fix that before >> v13 beta1 release. So barring any objection, I will commit the patch. >> >> +        values[8] = Int64GetDatum(stat.stat_reset_timestamp); >> >> Also I found another small issue: pg_stat_get_slru() returns the timestamp >> when pg_stat_slru was reset by using Int64GetDatum(). This works maybe >> because the timestamp is also int64. But TimestampTzGetDatum() should >> be used here, instead. Patch attached. Thought? >> > > I agree with both fixes. Pushed both. Thanks! Regards, -- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION