Feedback-ID: ie0a040ee:Fastmail
Message-ID: <b6759cae-2ed0-460c-9564-5c88fc7abbf9@eisentraut.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 20:20:43 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Fix SET EXPRESSION for virtual columns with whole-row
 dependencies
To: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>, jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
References: <71242FEA-15A3-4073-9FA1-561CA744ACBD@gmail.com>
 <CACJufxHTK0Qk7AwdrHK=y8OtK--zEVY-Ossxx4UUgxaE2NCAXA@mail.gmail.com>
 <5B739323-C897-4B1A-9BFC-656E5CB4AD58@gmail.com>
 <B28E88B4-F8AA-40BA-A087-12BB9348B1E0@gmail.com>
 <B9D7A867-DE2D-4E7D-907D-0F9E26C3D8B3@gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
In-Reply-To: <B9D7A867-DE2D-4E7D-907D-0F9E26C3D8B3@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/b6759cae-2ed0-460c-9564-5c88fc7abbf9%40eisentraut.org>
Precedence: bulk

On 10.06.26 11:12, Chao Li wrote:
>> fter reading the other implementation in [1], I realized that I had missed the partial-index case, so I added coverage for that.
>>
>> I am still sending an updated version of this patch because my implementation is different from the one in [1]. I would like people to compare the two approaches and decide which direction is better.
>>
>> [1]https://postgr.es/m/ 
>> CAJTYsWXOkyeDVbzymWc9sKrq7Y_MUv6XJXN4H9GfsBOPd3NJ+w@mail.gmail.com
>>
>> Best regards,
>> --
>> Chao Li (Evan)
>> HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
>> https://www.highgo.com/
>>
>>
> Oops! Forgot the attachment. Here comes it.

This has been addressed via the patch in the other thread.