Subject: Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for
 pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view?
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>,
 Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>,
 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres@gmail.com>,
 Hannu Krosing <hannuk@google.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
 Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>,
 Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
 torikoshia <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com>, Atsushi Torikoshi
 <atorik@gmail.com>, Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro.yamada.tf@nttcom.co.jp>,
 Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>,
 Evgeny Efimkin <efimkin@yandex-team.ru>,
 PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
References: <20210413021246.GD4231@momjian.us>
 <20210413173016.GA29955@alvherre.pgsql> <20210414183326.GA10946@momjian.us>
 <20210420162244.GD30205@momjian.us>
 <a878d5ea-64a7-485e-5d2f-177618ebc52d@oss.nttdata.com>
 <20210422092317.xnuvva2322dflxdm@nol>
 <8f5e63b8-e8ed-0f80-d8c4-68222624c200@enterprisedb.com>
 <20210713061023.edgei4ooxexxsi5r@nol>
 <CABUevEzj-LqsZBZYj-rT=ibvTghAchMtxxciVgeqrMP6Q=tYVg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Message-ID: <b6b62bd0-be5d-2d01-c4e6-aad5c1d01e89@enterprisedb.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 06:36:48 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CABUevEzj-LqsZBZYj-rT=ibvTghAchMtxxciVgeqrMP6Q=tYVg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/b6b62bd0-be5d-2d01-c4e6-aad5c1d01e89%40enterprisedb.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 13.07.21 10:58, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Maybe "each distinct database id, each distinct user id, each distinct
> query id, and whether it is a top level statement or not"?
> 
> Or maybe "each distinct combination of database id, user id, query id
> and whether it's a top level statement or not"?

Okay, now I understand what is meant here.  The second one sounds good 
to me.