Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s1J7Z-00B9HF-VI for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 05:00:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s1J7X-00F6CB-BH for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 05:00:08 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s1J7X-00F6C3-1z for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 05:00:07 +0000 Received: from mail-lj1-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::22b]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s1J7V-000cVb-HZ for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 05:00:07 +0000 Received: by mail-lj1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2d8a2cbe1baso54176731fa.0 for ; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 22:00:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1714366803; x=1714971603; darn=postgresql.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gSewltZmAJOfvahkJEDQ24emOJii4X1uE6CnLQOxolM=; b=Li/Ok9KA9Hie1MGNeS+tTXoO6qxJquLTJQYvtwEwET7zt58SMWjR6sqLax/S7kDwdE WrmZ3S+1Ipir/+ZqKEP77bqYAD5ph1IejfP4YmcrJ5Uyqir3csQp9Az2oUrILeWd6eW0 PmTHqOwnPwiOPMdaW+Xw8Ts95oGMHx1+hMIn9cpYgr3nO5rTHWlv3ERVb6dZkmc3J0n/ ZvhNbtHQzqNUeS4/RI4zDEOoDQhYQFZ0MigXAh+atlEaLQd19ZQ14YzsTFDymPbL1jtF K1iOB1m5VF7tQoDVvHXUtRJ3kFemd0lQl8E9G/DqcYyC7u4YzmTiYvk1j9BEdswb/Zk/ M+Tg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1714366803; x=1714971603; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gSewltZmAJOfvahkJEDQ24emOJii4X1uE6CnLQOxolM=; b=QqE6NRpjlcBYcJRscrVW7f9LO0OkCuPH4Dzr2GeClvvoZwTay+nlhw1ivAc9pNoyHa JqaZ/HC9I5U5BJ9QBrWG81UP+9KOv6OJ3pebcyuZAk2rNN+GCNdo9dtkS3f0YB1A/xwX G+GvOFXUppYbTu+T83jjjxsymM/JhmPQV3/EZpp0DDgDlrwMFeOtIA/eTcH9qCZ77aOx wz9cEF8ASJMIwKOx8k0NY/4CDWgoIZsiR6Vpk/dzPrcbr4kQfthkzgkJpPAmB/r+ibEr 41jSaTb2PRkhShFLAlwinn6NtOGeea7lWe38RjJwBk3XiJn6zQp4dAE+FUncqVl46KB0 vSGQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXPz6OVOgmE+vzZgzm72nfvZbnQEqLI0138MoU6aUzJvXfeWkv/Pgge9hMwaesEW3L5XUOFNyGQEnv4c3AeCsyHFVCujhVZ/CMHx8pg X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwiatK2MmdE+zmySMs5y4hwsHw75cP0txn2pDrPJS6mAAPG4seu FlZZIvSv5+E9lb0eGGZBYOiuTtSSf40VsucB07C/aQ+YO1far9pQrao1I9Cs X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHRX6xHyE/DjFmXg/iv8FemR/xE4mLvd6Wjskx5QSTeZfFMbJsu2GcBSkdxCw6FOlHG3KJNoQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:4806:b0:51b:6366:3459 with SMTP id eo6-20020a056512480600b0051b63663459mr6609764lfb.67.1714366803178; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 22:00:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [1.0.0.7] ([178.155.23.194]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w31-20020a0565120b1f00b0051c508790a0sm1398796lfu.229.2024.04.28.22.00.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 28 Apr 2024 22:00:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 08:00:00 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 Subject: Re: A failure in prepared_xacts test Content-Language: en-US To: Richard Guo , PostgreSQL-development References: From: Alexander Lakhin In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Hello Richard, 29.04.2024 04:12, Richard Guo wrote: > Does anyone have any clue to this failure? > > FWIW, after another run of this test, the failure just disappears.  Does > it suggest that the test case is flaky? > I think this could be caused by the ecpg test twophase executed simultaneously with the test prepared_xacts thanks to meson's jobs parallelization. Best regards, Alexander