Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tNDHp-009M5e-KI for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 15:45:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tNDHn-008FTe-62 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 15:45:32 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tNDEe-008AwB-Cd for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 15:42:17 +0000 Received: from mail.postgrespro.ru ([93.174.131.139]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tNDEc-003ANn-Tg for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 15:42:16 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=postgrespro.ru; s=mx2023; t=1734363733; bh=YwCCSNIQVM8T3gCiCke4/GYbdXmLKxj0DwqAau+HYOA=; h=Message-ID:Date:User-Agent:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:From; b=LHgha87/LAqFP7goMShTit9kUjNoVAJ7AM6rNPtejTMFrlLjQduFj1pQZ+DLBXvCT FlHmbk+H9gedfnH/gPZEECBMpZ4leonZ/BGCPWpKj0u2RSlWgcLnxnXD1433rLsOMz MLbkXP/+RCJNa+fs2Z/pTl4P/1RCgssrxWeB74cqHhBEbXioe6l1GtqsPydReDdW4G jYajUyjFcb/rEuxdh6uoDFVpy+7X6Z9sC1sjyeCqJOsFOa1bYDQGRkD9JOwCscRTlx yD4RpgCV2jC/NmMG/NIUJVjt80fmbgQvlgCfsbt2SIEXg0KU7VY8lXwFItjaAeI0nm ln8jPhk+1qb6w== Received: from [192.168.1.11] (mx-ll-171.6.243-28.dynamic.3bb.co.th [171.6.243.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: p.luzanov@postgrespro.ru) by mail.postgrespro.ru (Postfix/587) with ESMTPSA id 2050760189; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 18:42:11 +0300 (MSK) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------yHhZ0CUx0Yus0Eq0TI4R2BEo" Message-ID: Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 18:42:07 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: DOCS: pg_createsubscriber wrong link? To: Amit Kapila , Peter Smith , Daniel Gustafsson Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers References: Content-Language: en-US, ru-RU From: Pavel Luzanov In-Reply-To: X-KSMG-AntiPhishing: NotDetected, bases: 2024/12/16 13:07:00 X-KSMG-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: not scanned X-KSMG-AntiSpam-Status: not scanned, disabled by settings X-KSMG-AntiVirus: Kaspersky Secure Mail Gateway, version 2.1.0.7854, bases: 2024/12/16 14:34:00 #26899616 X-KSMG-AntiVirus-Status: NotDetected, skipped X-KSMG-LinksScanning: not scanned, disabled by settings X-KSMG-Message-Action: skipped X-KSMG-Rule-ID: 1 List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------yHhZ0CUx0Yus0Eq0TI4R2BEo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 16.12.2024 13:56, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 10:58 AM Peter Smith wrote: >> While reviewing the pg_createsubscriber [1] docs I found a potentially >> wrong linkend. >> >> This sentence: >> "For smaller databases, initial data synchronization is recommended." >> >> links to [2] ("29.4.5. Initial Data Synchronization"). >> >> This seems to have been deliberately changed (commit [3]) >> > Yeah, the change made by commit 84db9a0eb1 is wrong and your latest > patch in this thread looks good to me. I am adding Daniel and the > original author to see if they think differently. It looks like my mistake. I missed that "Initial Data Synchronization" section is a subsection of "Row filters". There is no hidden reason other than matching the link name with the subsection name and my inattention. v2 of proposed patch looks good to me. -- Pavel Luzanov Postgres Professional:https://postgrespro.com --------------yHhZ0CUx0Yus0Eq0TI4R2BEo Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 16.12.2024 13:56, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 10:58 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
While reviewing the pg_createsubscriber [1] docs I found a potentially
wrong linkend.

This sentence:
"For smaller databases, initial data synchronization is recommended."

links to [2] ("29.4.5. Initial Data Synchronization").

This seems to have been deliberately changed (commit [3])

Yeah, the change made by commit 84db9a0eb1 is wrong and your latest
patch in this thread looks good to me. I am adding Daniel and the
original author to see if they think differently.
It looks like my mistake.
I missed that "Initial Data Synchronization" section is a subsection
of "Row filters". There is no hidden reason other than matching
the link name with the subsection name and my inattention.

v2 of proposed patch looks good to me.

-- 
Pavel Luzanov
Postgres Professional: https://postgrespro.com
--------------yHhZ0CUx0Yus0Eq0TI4R2BEo--