Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n726x-0002Jf-Ok for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 21:21:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n726v-0005VS-NB for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 21:21:49 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n726v-0005VJ-Dx for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 21:21:49 +0000 Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:dc4:8::228]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n726s-0003kW-Qe for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 21:21:48 +0000 Received: (Authenticated sender: adsend@dunslane.net) by relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B52531BF203; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 21:21:41 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:21:39 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0 Subject: Re: Why is src/test/modules/committs/t/002_standby.pl flaky? Content-Language: en-US To: Thomas Munro , Alexander Lakhin Cc: Tom Lane , pgsql-hackers References: <1600941.1641685316@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1609152.1641691036@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3b904d7b-ef84-6f1b-9326-9f88c1374eb8@gmail.com> <5d507424-13ce-d19f-2f5d-ab4c6a987316@gmail.com> From: Andrew Dunstan In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On 1/10/22 15:52, Thomas Munro wrote: > > Hmm, one thing I'm still unclear on: did this problem really start > with 6051857fc/ed52c3707? My initial email in this thread lists > similar failures going back further, doesn't it? (And what's tern > doing mixed up in this mess?) Your list contains at least some false positives. e.g. which has a different script failing. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com