Subject: Re: snapbuild woes
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org,
 Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
References: <f41d64c7-1ae2-fac7-bf7f-f24dfe2d33bd@2ndquadrant.com>
 <edd7316a312a869c6548d20439be3708@xs4all.nl>
 <b81b0426-68e3-aea3-eb3f-e56d53f0779c@2ndquadrant.com>
 <6e0a391d-d85a-dbf6-ce33-4c26a486e909@pgmasters.net>
 <20170408135659.ersubdrhjp736nob@alap3.anarazel.de>
 <aac311f8b41582e08ccb127d3a553e0d@xs4all.nl>
 <20170408143059.nrzuwyvv5apnhhta@alap3.anarazel.de>
 <20170412063142.GC2870454@tornado.leadboat.com>
 <d6f4a15c-b95d-54b1-0b06-f24bcd0b6fcb@2ndquadrant.com>
 <20170412172151.nauhiagitlpfxief@alap3.anarazel.de>
 <20170413045812.GA2917375@tornado.leadboat.com>
 <07A5CF2E-04F7-4E87-9183-F4C4F2B7307B@anarazel.de>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>,
 Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>,
 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>,
 pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
From: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Message-ID: <bf1fbfa1-691f-b3ae-eb5b-e918812cbec8@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 20:00:53 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <07A5CF2E-04F7-4E87-9183-F4C4F2B7307B@anarazel.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org

On 13/04/17 07:02, Andres Freund wrote:
> 
> On April 12, 2017 9:58:12 PM PDT, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:21:51AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
>>> On 2017-04-12 11:03:57 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>> On 4/12/17 02:31, Noah Misch wrote:
>>>>>>> But I hope you mean to commit these snapbuild patches before
>> the postgres 10
>>>>>>> release?  As far as I know, logical replication is still very
>> broken without
>>>>>>> them (or at least some of that set of 5 patches - I don't know
>> which ones
>>>>>>> are essential and which may not be).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, these should go into 10 *and* earlier releases, and I don't
>> plan to
>>>>>> wait for 2017-07.
>>>>>
>>>>> [Action required within three days.  This is a generic
>> notification.]
>>>>
>>>> I'm hoping for a word from Andres on this.
>>>
>>> Feel free to reassign to me.
>>
>> Thanks for volunteering; I'll do that shortly.  Please observe the
>> policy on
>> open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar
>> days of
>> this message.  Include a date for your subsequent status update.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com
> 
> Will, volunteering might be the wrong word.  These ate all my fault, although none look v10 specific.
> 

Yeah none of this is v10 specific, the importance to v10 is that it
affects the logical replication in core, not just extensions like in
9.4-9.6.

-- 
  Petr Jelinek                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
  PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers