Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1m1411-0007eE-8P
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 07 Jul 2021 09:38:47 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1m1410-0002vq-2f
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 07 Jul 2021 09:38:46 +0000
Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <boris@codesynthesis.com>)
	id 1m140z-0002vi-NW
	for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 07 Jul 2021 09:38:45 +0000
Received: from codesynthesis.com ([188.40.148.39])
	by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <boris@codesynthesis.com>)
	id 1m140w-0001Qr-Ft
	for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 07 Jul 2021 09:38:44 +0000
Received: from brak.codesynthesis.com (unknown [105.187.34.11])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by codesynthesis.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 38FCD5FB5A;
	Wed,  7 Jul 2021 09:38:39 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codesynthesis.com;
	s=mail1; t=1625650719;
	bh=WRzTVwxsw+f+psnhc4LN8KJ+Xm0IrdC0cCHpZOsrAYY=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From;
	b=cCPiORxMCTTMY+rWkTCRK80Y1ELPKwpc/vNJzVjXXtx8+apsCOE2ILYAfpVwFIi0S
	 VdTn/yBiPo+n7OH5WA9eSy8IfQAkS0oyLM9gLn2yV8/MhPZsSZyGhGyd/0VFiKv1KB
	 OBt7ru0qwtrZbBGvEYXYQW2Lbqvv7+uT2IMOq63znzQZt9IFeJfiRzXHsf5WkLhPT6
	 6dCEmFKvNLYjltS9mBHlWXKTaEg/1VvyYxnDhkR4tDsbini39q5n53rJcgvmLgFKgK
	 gO7SP2oQp3NEm+qu3vbZuhwjV6eAK7ss34TAtQmd8Jcgrc93GfCF9G/v8HW8ZwxHOy
	 qVZvPZ9QiHcFw==
Received: by brak.codesynthesis.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 8CA9F1A800C4; Wed,  7 Jul 2021 11:38:33 +0200 (SAST)
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 11:38:33 +0200
From: Boris Kolpackov <boris@codesynthesis.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvaro.herrera@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Pipeline mode and PQpipelineSync()
Message-ID: <boris.20210707113338@codesynthesis.com>
References: <boris.20210706074733@codesynthesis.com>
 <202107061747.tlss7f2somqf@alvherre.pgsql>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <202107061747.tlss7f2somqf@alvherre.pgsql>
Organization: Code Synthesis
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
List-Id: <pgsql-hackers.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-hackers>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/boris.20210707113338%40codesynthesis.com>
Precedence: bulk

Alvaro Herrera <alvaro.herrera@2ndquadrant.com> writes:

> Can you please try with this patch?

I don't get any difference in behavior with this patch. That is, I
still get the unexpected NULL result. Does it make a difference for
your reproducer?