On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 3:38 PM Joe Conway <[email protected]> wrote:
So the questions are:
1. Do those two formats work for the initial implementation?
Yes. We provide a stream-oriented format and one atomic-import format.
2. Is the default correct or should it be switched
e.g. rather than specifying FORCE_ARRAY to get an
array, something like FORCE_NO_ARRAY to get JSON lines
and the JSON array is default?
No default?
Require explicit of a sub-format when the main format is JSON.
JSON_OBJECT_ROWSJSON_ARRAY_OF_OBJECTS
For a future compact array-structured-composites sub-format:JSON_ARRAY_OF_ARRAYSJSON_ARRAY_ROWS
No default seems unlike the way we treat other COPY options. I'm
not terribly fussed about which format to have as the default, but
I think we should have one.
cheers
andrew
-- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com