public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vik Fearing <[email protected]>
To: Alexandra Wang <[email protected]>
To: Mark Dilger <[email protected]>
Cc: Matheus Alcantara <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]>
Cc: Nikita Glukhov <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Cc: David E. Wheeler <[email protected]>
Cc: jian he <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: SQL:2023 JSON simplified accessor support
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 15:27:50 +0100
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK98qZ1nz6ZZhQqTOCNwRguZE5GsBLW5BQT_k=s7AA6gc2CN_g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAK98qZ2QGcyJrJAFv9wjY6S8yP9dUVnmG9Gb4OXuzuMMuM1Z5Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAK98qZ3Ly6PhRwCVmMKJBba5oHVF9k370MMT2b_gep-SuQfRtg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK98qZ1za8XgOLY+2hQMPGoxVYFyh=dDkM2dZPVeJK4J6poyvA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK98qZ0EfrPcv3ZwGdeDiLPEpXYfHOEc8S2D=OCPJGcyWy5d-g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK98qZ1rZaVNy6ViangQom4iinZVH7=ebqhTsPxMQbN5ZtE9XQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFY6G8cY5SUG5L-0ryVpom6HynE49p8-XQ59qkaEgnZZJ-c4Rg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFY6G8eUGcU3A4AHprgYbSOAOj7+WGhGxS_YP0wd2+aCpZTiNg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK98qZ14uKKRVFg4ibzMfReYaZD6Byxq8nYnvNNtXNjCfcd8kQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHgHdKtL9nNaKXGCLt9gWugVzYWKhoBDQ7NESUwdCBty8kFK-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK98qZ1nz6ZZhQqTOCNwRguZE5GsBLW5BQT_k=s7AA6gc2CN_g@mail.gmail.com>


On 13/03/2025 15:02, Alexandra Wang wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thank you so much for reviewing! I have attached the new patches.
>

Hi Alex,


I am reviewing this from a feature perspective and not from a code 
perspective.  On the whole, this looks good to me from a standards point 
of view.


There are two things that stand out to me about this feature:


1) I am not seeing the ** syntax in the standard, so does it need to be 
signaled as not supported?  Perhaps I am just overlooking something.


2) There is no support for <JSON item method>. Since this appears to be 
constructing a jsonpath query, could that not be added to the syntax and 
allow jsonpath to throw the error if the function doesn't exist?


-- 

Vik Fearing






view thread (68+ messages)  latest in thread

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: SQL:2023 JSON simplified accessor support
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox