public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Jonathan S. Katz <[email protected]>
To: Thom Brown <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 17 Beta 1 release announcement draft
Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 17:07:07 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA-aLv51pVPWCn09vCqXerHwzMeGJgn3riexn=WwdS2Rsc+oow@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
<CAA-aLv51pVPWCn09vCqXerHwzMeGJgn3riexn=WwdS2Rsc+oow@mail.gmail.com>
On 5/16/24 1:10 AM, Thom Brown wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2024, 02:45 Jonathan S. Katz <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Attached is a copy of the PostgreSQL 17 Beta 1 release announcement
> draft. This contains a user-facing summary of some of the features that
> will be available in the Beta, as well as a call to test. I've made an
> effort to group them logically around the different workflows they
> affect.
>
> A few notes:
>
> * The section with the features is not 80-char delimited. I will do
> that
> before the final copy
>
> * There is an explicit callout that we've added in the SQL/JSON
> features
> that were previously reverted in PG15. I want to ensure we're
> transparent about that, but also use it as a hook to get people testing.
>
> When reviewing:
>
> * Please check for correctness of feature descriptions, keeping in mind
> this is targeted for a general audience
>
> * Please indicate if you believe there's a notable omission, or if we
> should omit any of these callouts
>
> * Please indicate if a description is confusing - I'm happy to rewrite
> to ensure it's clearer.
>
> Please provide feedback no later than Wed 2024-05-22 18:00 UTC. As the
> beta release takes some extra effort, I want to ensure all changes are
> in with time to spare before release day.
>
>
> "Now as of PostgreSQL 17, you can now use parallel index builds for
> [BRIN](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/brin.html
> <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/brin.html;) indexes."
>
> The 2nd "now" is redundant.
>
>
> "Finally, PostgreSQL 17 adds more explicitly SIMD instructions,
> including AVX-512 support for the
> [`bit_count](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/functions-bitstring.html
> <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/functions-bitstring.html;) function."
>
> Would "SIMD-explicit instructions" be better? Also, I know you may not
> be using markdown for the final version, but the bit_count backtick
> isn't matched by a closing backtick.
>
>
> "[`COPY`](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/sql-copy.html
> <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/sql-copy.html;), used to efficiently
> bulk load data into PostgreSQL"
>
> The "used to" makes me stumble into reading it as meaning "it previously
> could efficiently bulk load data".
>
> Perhaps just add a "which is" before "used"?
>
>
> "PostgreSQL 17 includes a built-in collation provider that provides
> similar semantics to the `C` collation provided by libc."
>
> "provider", "provides", and "provided" feels too repetitive.
>
> How about, "PostgreSQL 17 includes a built-in collation provider with
> semantics similar to the `C` collation offered by libc."?
Thanks - I accepted (with modifications) most of the suggestions here.
I'll include in the next version of the draft.
Jonathan
Attachments:
[application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP_signature.asc (840B, ../[email protected]/2-OpenPGP_signature.asc)
download
view thread (2+ messages)
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 17 Beta 1 release announcement draft
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox