Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cztvx-0000gp-A8 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 23:50:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cztvw-0002KL-TJ for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 23:50:20 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cztuQ-0005V2-39 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 23:48:46 +0000 Received: from mail-yb0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c09::229]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cztuJ-0000eC-RM for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 23:48:45 +0000 Received: by mail-yb0-x229.google.com with SMTP id s22so2912810ybe.3 for ; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 16:48:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=2ndquadrant-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:subject:to:references:cc:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=D1VgcN8PexJiFTarAP/T3ZR2YBx9CTVnX05WiWdH+Fo=; b=HVBg+aCON88r4v4XBYOa5l26r71fzlMo+U4JDHDaWDSAjoMab/dZFR6ZvA7lxnRvsu O1CRFbapCrO8VS+C46Nh19FEaO2xRMYrXHmeObaHU6ohOWg+WOzm2oyJVMKzHFqzr4yq quWm82GJBjAV2jkKtq0ouNf6Ud8Hja5V5NFulka/YAR5aAv4htXwr2h8HO/GtgeqfT4T /7gNC3L7jSlMnAbkAK3mGNK6gBrsFd8hgStrERe987MVISyXLNV/BIUYNf+OEjNkYokV 3m40SeDPGZzAAM3AbYP6cVIK8uiT+NAppEiscqlZ+0NqoukN95/P/NO8hrduBJF1Ywlt WOvw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:references:cc:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=D1VgcN8PexJiFTarAP/T3ZR2YBx9CTVnX05WiWdH+Fo=; b=hZLUSycr1NTP5Z4AfqqHTQ7MVnqQwUUclNIKHxkDCjTKbAQmLhLlBuf9G1ywb9Li0b WSWvcuOCJtVXruI6nm/0/97TgsJzYXstBxUgcxs6KnQKmh6mTWO92Yr9vRsoVQJ+Osak vgS6VBS8qUQsTAzPRR3jTeOL+S7NyN/R+NIC5JFP8xFSy3pTC2lZ9nDg9w4Ucz3Dw+bQ qS5bd0JUlcJKVlItHseGz8EHDeH5u3NlZ3Z/BbY/g0feLHGrXQppzqoCDzpgih8bxBRV 744uM3ImdUaLbvKnfpAGscEp6s/XWWGXehbjBIyyp4Xbf27MZlbzf8BIAYF1ZuCdY+/D v7Kg== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4W4SY1C0zWCH5y+ENWNPsz79DT3WGnB0n5xzfjhTiH9YRVa34J C5mI29gxQFK6ViEIOFIk95D/0/84V80yIVlkM44TttD9M5FCVqxpWsS+TgYt9WqVmCJRBm7bSGG 2gMhKcxcz6Ec6hzb43+EjVyNj8+SIBjI7uL1l66NRpQwvUoe2FAiB26X/+WCE2RqvvbhroOfew/ U= X-Received: by 10.37.108.11 with SMTP id h11mr14377915ybc.172.1492386518104; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 16:48:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.10.146] ([98.122.164.227]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a83sm1635961ywe.65.2017.04.16.16.48.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 16 Apr 2017 16:48:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Dunstan X-Google-Original-From: Andrew Dunstan Subject: Re: Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded) To: Peter Eisentraut , Tom Lane References: <20170415154440.3eg3dltxs5zybmv2@alvherre.pgsql> <389c14b5-3678-e617-450f-07bf29197249@2ndQuadrant.com> <29572.1492272795@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4dda7d5c-b7f7-f89a-792e-a52e72be71d3@2ndQuadrant.com> <1d15be07-f625-ce11-d4a9-2379cd0399a8@2ndquadrant.com> Cc: Alvaro Herrera , Andreas Karlsson , Andres Freund , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Message-ID: Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 19:48:36 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1d15be07-f625-ce11-d4a9-2379cd0399a8@2ndquadrant.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org On 04/16/2017 07:43 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 4/15/17 12:33, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> Sure. Just means putting this code a bit later in the file. "make check" >> is only one initdb, so it won't cost much. I'm still inclined to force a >> TAP test for initdb with no TZ set, though. > How much is this going to buy overall? Is it worth the complications? > I don't know, but it's a very small change. I am going to spend some time instrumenting where the time goes in various tests. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers