public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
To: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Do we still need gen_node_support.pl's nodetag ABI stability check?
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 21:30:17 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>

On 14.04.26 07:04, Tom Lane wrote:
> On the one hand, there's much to be said for belt-and-suspenders-too
> safety checks.  On the other hand, updating gen_node_support.pl is
> an extra manual step while creating a branch, so it's easy to forget
> or get wrong.  It's also not very clear why this particular sort
> of ABI break in a stable branch is any worse than other hazards.

This might still be helpful because it checks during local builds and 
doesn't rely on the buildfarm.

view thread (7+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Do we still need gen_node_support.pl's nodetag ABI stability check?
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox