X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.193]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED0E530E5EB for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:58:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193]) by localhost (svr1.postgresql.org [64.117.224.193]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 33609-05 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 16:57:59 -0300 (ADT) Received: from biglumber.com (biglumber.com [207.228.252.42]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FAA430EA75 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 16:57:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail 7868 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2003 19:57:58 -0000 Received: from biglumber.com (HELO localhost) (207.228.252.42) by 0 with SMTP; 10 Jun 2003 19:57:58 -0000 From: greg@turnstep.com To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Feature freeze date X-PGP-Key: 2529 DF6A B8F7 9407 E944 45B4 BC9B 9067 1496 4AC8 X-Request-PGP: http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 In-Reply-To: <200306101925.h5AJPd418238@candle.pha.pa.us> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:57:56 -0000 X-Mailer: JoyMail 1.37 Message-ID: X-Archive-Number: 200306/216 X-Sequence-Number: 39523 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > We are 5 days away from the feature freeze date, but with the almost > week of downtime we have had, I don't think we can stick to that date. > > Do we choose July 1 as feature freeze and July 15 as beta, or push beta > start to Auguest 1? Well it would certainly be nice if CVS was working first. I am still getting the following error: $ cvs update /projects/cvsroot: no such repository - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200306101553 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html iD8DBQE+5jgyvJuQZxSWSsgRArHRAKDl582A3ntupytI/29x4dj/r6Ue8wCg88xD 6Y8n8+m31p0y5izI2mut4Zk= =mSQQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----