public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Joel Jacobson <[email protected]>
To: Aleksander Alekseev <[email protected]>
To: pgsql-hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Is *fast* 32-bit support still important?
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2024 14:54:39 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ7c6TMzbdm+Y-de4H1MkJ0z=VaE1K3cRVrdrc=v9j4icmTurQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
	<CAJ7c6TO+QUYf7B3zBj+7Pf3ikEfOub0D-X7JnH1qJ2jvaXwAwg@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAJ7c6TMzbdm+Y-de4H1MkJ0z=VaE1K3cRVrdrc=v9j4icmTurQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 5, 2024, at 14:24, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
>> Could we add a text message that is displayed to a user,
>> when compiling PostgreSQL on a 32-bit platform?
>
> What would be actionable items depending on the results? Option A:
> someone claims to use PostgreSQL on 32-bit hardware. Option B: no one
> admits that they use PostgreSQL on 32-bit hardware (but maybe someone
> actually does and/or will in the future). Regardless of the results
> you can't drop the support of 32-bit software (until it gets as
> difficult and pointless as with AIX that was dropped recently) and it
> will not tell you how slow the 32-bit version of PostgreSQL can be.
>
> If there are no actionable items why create a poll?

Never suggested *dropping* 32-bit support; that's a different question.

However, if we were to receive input from 32-bit PostgreSQL users explaining
why they need *high performance*, then I imagine that could affect how we
feel about 32-bit optimizations.

Right now, there doesn't seem to be a consensus on whether we should optimize
for 32-bit or not.

On the one hand, we have commit 5e1f3b9 that says:
"While it adds some space on 32-bit machines, we aren't optimizing
for that case anymore."

On the other hand, we have the ongoing work on optimizing numeric_mul,
where a patch is suggested with extra code to optimize for 32-bit.

I agree, however, that the absence of any comments from such a poll would not
give us any more information.

/Joel

view thread (5+ messages)

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Is *fast* 32-bit support still important?
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox