public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
To: Alexandra Wang <[email protected]>
To: Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: jsonb subscripting vs SQL/JSON array accessor semantics (SQL:2023)
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 16:43:00 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK98qZ1kEsF9bwfjftuRfcCX59KChQw52NQ9K4qMMuL3UMHA+Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAK98qZ1P_edO9hZJVMuUpnXjN-9H=dz2zUj-06G5qW9CMjLqzA@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAK98qZ1kEsF9bwfjftuRfcCX59KChQw52NQ9K4qMMuL3UMHA+Q@mail.gmail.com>

On 09.02.26 22:15, Alexandra Wang wrote:
> I'd appreciate more votes on whether this direction makes sense, or if
> there are concerns I've missed.

At the moment, I see no consensus here, in fact, it seems there are more 
opinions than options. ;-)  I think this is an important topic to 
resolve one way or another, and there also appear to be at least some 
documentation gaps if not bugs in the existing code.  I created a 
commitfest entry for this for PG20-1, so we can continue tracking this.

view thread (4+ messages)

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: jsonb subscripting vs SQL/JSON array accessor semantics (SQL:2023)
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox