Message-ID: <df50d393-d337-472d-ba2e-c1e397752723@pgmasters.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 10:48:56 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Add recovery to pg_control and remove backup_label
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>,
 Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
References: <2daf8adc-8db7-4204-a7f2-a7e94e2bfa4b@pgmasters.net>
 <CAKFQuwYPu+PMyNvwnvs0x_7c9X57igMj1ED-kdYhnF+GEZvqJg@mail.gmail.com>
 <2e7c913d-3c60-411a-b7d9-2d728b903286@pgmasters.net>
 <ZUh0NzDQCjjonX0Z@paquier.xyz>
Content-Language: en-US
From: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
In-Reply-To: <ZUh0NzDQCjjonX0Z@paquier.xyz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/df50d393-d337-472d-ba2e-c1e397752723%40pgmasters.net>
Precedence: bulk

On 11/6/23 01:05, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 10:10:42AM -0400, David Steele wrote:
>> We are still planning to address this issue in the back branches.
> 
> FWIW, redesigning the backend code in charge of doing base backups in
> the back branches is out of scope.  Based on a read of the proposed
> patch, it includes catalog changes which would require a catversion
> bump, so that's not going to work anyway.

I did not mean this patch -- rather some variation of what Thomas has 
been working on, more than likely.

Regards,
-David