Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jKNrz-0003NU-UG for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 15:04:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jKNry-0005QS-PO for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 15:04:30 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jKNry-0005QL-EO for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 15:04:30 +0000 Received: from mail-wm1-x342.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::342]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jKNrv-0000CE-3Z for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 15:04:29 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-x342.google.com with SMTP id t128so7503990wma.0 for ; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 08:04:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=2ndquadrant-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=D05NjzsRzPThQVCNvwDLVA7u+k24bhe+MSPvo2Tlsck=; b=Nt10rL9KynIonTiOfeYMgT91b49+6CWQueJvAuBGjB4IaTQPo4zPR6maIc9B4QlCs3 q3OLNAONJABeVMIzuSJzhEM44aZ/yBxdY1JSMC+yMZMsqtjaHK74uaiNOm8zvpbdLDyD qE3WQT+WC9bYdS4jnV4/QEkq3qWqOxvNAY7aD3GLAM9gcQlFRyvNUmtXcBybrN3qsHlQ kXyR/sPuZE6Uo/ejlBqT0sAHaU3AGeJPyKhOBW+L/u3Bm+xMAoUhzU9W2b1qE/15uPrm 0K2obu0YKhTv/A8YMBeUNgBzbXu6b5YehE5h48Epp3bM+bgCYrQHL3O7Cbeo6SbX81JR BPxw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=D05NjzsRzPThQVCNvwDLVA7u+k24bhe+MSPvo2Tlsck=; b=nWHKYnHOvqAPI7uD9VdJMuF4xY5iXFaQRrhiQTOlC1yi3fqq0YXKskeWIo7TYM4Cue lUq5r17tjD5Sz7HLSEeG5p+4qicR+8uprZIK5yphxvqsKXc9Sf3kBMhlNVJ/6XLJxkYl xgg9oNZIv+zYoHlyTPRWjyLKvl+u55UHJurBaiovira+NX6Vtp/pnsN8M9ZPvFiJDOBt NYiA8WRqiH8fhBa0sICjbLbnAmWY/iIz1IxcWglomKd3An1d0/Ns9gV4c7BP2ehK4O4c pPSBy8Xc2q2dABNyCDxWUPsU3ICVJ0Xw7BSdgak+na5pr5eXlN4I1YcEtt48ok+H8+jN TNhw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZ31jAlaC3OOIO8jRBgZLjIgI0gtl7X3IETxBJdo3ZiWkMFCIGz 3itpV/kY+sHy22OpX1F63lBGdqcZ3gko5Bb7l0y0v/jCmpLTClG9mgj0QrzFJsjs8n7NI9hp35l WIwMTqxRfVv1RxKyRUFUFpvRxgMVMIS7lpGW09HbbPCVfsZ03WElRQ21UF0QYH5CbJs0o5qhkI8 tsehs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypItUbz0kcS1Hya2UbidZjLrLXdgeO0CzR1NP+m8pewTzOEEbVlnVSyGnO1euEW6RB8dYoF3QA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2f90:: with SMTP id t16mr9407128wmn.66.1585926265448; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 08:04:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:8308:13b:9400:c4bc:d2a3:915a:f059? ([2a02:8308:13b:9400:c4bc:d2a3:915a:f059]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k9sm13120664wrd.74.2020.04.03.08.04.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Apr 2020 08:04:24 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: adding partitioned tables to publications To: Tom Lane Cc: Amit Langote , Peter Eisentraut , Rafia Sabih , PostgreSQL-development References: <4f999141-97c8-c968-a726-0a1ec3e36e47@2ndquadrant.com> <44ecae53-98! 61-71b7-1d43-4658acc52519@2ndquadrant.com> <5183.1585925998@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Petr Jelinek Message-ID: Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 17:04:23 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5183.1585925998@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On 03/04/2020 16:59, Tom Lane wrote: > Petr Jelinek writes: >> AFAIK gcov can't handle multiple instances of same process being started >> as it just overwrites the coverage files. So for TAP test it will report >> bogus info (as in some code that's executed will look as not executed). > > Hm, really? I routinely run "make check" (ie, parallel regression > tests) under coverage, and I get results that seem sane. If I were > losing large chunks of the data, I think I'd have noticed. > Parallel regression still just starts single postgres instance no? -- Petr Jelinek 2ndQuadrant - PostgreSQL Solutions for the Enterprise https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/