Subject: Re: pageinspect: Hash index support
To: Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>
References: <e2ac6c58-b93f-9dd9-f4e6-d6d30add7fdf@redhat.com>
 <CAMkU=1weMVE+Re7NQyAtXT5g6E5Fziw9PVU9UDapb0AG5MH=YQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE9k0Pk4dC9VrzV7Vm6em7JFzRMGfzx2=eYu0Yb_Psga-W47Ww@mail.gmail.com>
 <e1bda3f7-dc99-c610-4d48-58815f5b7515@redhat.com>
 <CAE9k0P=OQSEj0x9z91tvE9P1f-Ht7x7z8X+eDWQGTJNSFbn9yg@mail.gmail.com>
 <5d64a536-cc90-ce96-b68f-5b6bd3206476@redhat.com>
 <CAB7nPqTT3ZEm8QKsYYxfUnWL+P3p2mAbud7AFiZpK_JKx3eADA@mail.gmail.com>
 <d235dcd6-146a-1269-73a0-da9a55bfeddc@redhat.com>
 <80a00b5c-56d3-dffb-8dba-edf5d2167b12@2ndquadrant.com>
 <16d89e7e-cb1a-cb5d-e944-6f10c324a312@redhat.com>
 <c982b01c-06bc-485b-5dde-057ee244261a@2ndquadrant.com>
 <836487ee-8d4e-cd49-54ac-f4793ddba5ae@redhat.com>
 <8a751498-6ee9-b943-abf3-b5641851d7de@2ndquadrant.com>
 <62ee2eba-3a5b-06d3-e224-cfe00b395be7@redhat.com>
 <f52f2117-627b-baa3-1e83-59394e881bf5@2ndquadrant.com>
 <f8a19652-c5e4-4b8f-a461-62d886ff2400@2ndquadrant.com>
 <66afc31d-e97a-41c3-da4c-bfa02fa2d54e@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>,
 Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>,
 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
 PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Organization: 2ndQuadrant
Message-ID: <eb68fb02-5a85-e643-11cf-9319dd7edf2b@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:28:32 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <66afc31d-e97a-41c3-da4c-bfa02fa2d54e@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org

On 10/3/16 8:52 AM, Jesper Pedersen wrote:
> On 09/29/2016 04:02 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 9/29/16 4:00 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> Since the commit fest is drawing to a close, I'll set this patch as
>>> returned with feedback.
>>
>> Actually, the CF app informs me that moving to the next CF is more
>> appropriate, so I have done that.
>>
> 
> Ok, thanks for your feedback.
> 
> Maybe "Returned with Feedback" is more appropriate, as there is still 
> development left.

I have applied the documentation change that introduced subsections,
which seems quite useful independently.  I have also committed the tests
that I proposed and will work through the failures.

As no new patch has been posted for the 2016-11 CF, I will close the
patch entry now.  Please submit an updated patch when you have the time,
keeping an eye on ongoing work to update hash indexes.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers