Feedback-ID: i131946ab:Fastmail
Message-ID: <ed11e858-12e9-2a9f-3091-d887a544f1a6@enterprisedb.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:36:18 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?
Content-Language: en-US
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Cc: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>,
 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
 PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
References: <CAHut+Pv8Oa7v06hJb3+HzCtM2u-3oHWMdvXVHhvi7ofB83pNbg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKFQuwa9JtoCBVc6CJb7NC5FqMeEAy_A8X4H8t6kVaw7fz9LTw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHut+Pv5Efz1TLWOLSoFvoyC0mq+s92yFSd534ctWSdjEFtKCw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKFQuwYkM5UZT+6tG+NgZvDcd5VavS+xNHsGsWC8jS-KJsxh7w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHut+PvUdTdK5UGMXkm_U+1Cdez9y6x057GTrb3XSChybjdS3w@mail.gmail.com>
 <cfdb0030-8f62-ed6d-4246-8d9bf855bc48@enterprisedb.com>
 <CAKFQuwbQHgBJ4zSA_oKfO6qKvy3S16hx0HuMQGpxmm53MEQJqg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHut+PvYpLyEGrw=6gnakU7xNfAWHeNKqFbcDghfSjOdDutTjQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKFQuwYUCsugVg5cOgezh52W_2MwqMewXkr79DnxUVJ3Cs2dvA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKFQuwby7xWHek8=6UPaNXrhGA-i0B2zMOmBoGHgc4yaO8NH_w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHut+PuHhrBrYQ2cWkRuAuN6S1mAo0iEsnJSHcfOXazkF8xE8g@mail.gmail.com>
 <539d5720-01ce-3969-4c9f-1372af98b16c@enterprisedb.com>
 <CALDaNm3Z0sti4R7PuD0npA7tQoWRwK8dAh=QxWf+nU0ZGC=_Ww@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHut+PuHs=52Ag5RH2OExm8Qg6sfBkak4OY7onfiqYZ+HJ-iwQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHut+PuHs=52Ag5RH2OExm8Qg6sfBkak4OY7onfiqYZ+HJ-iwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ed11e858-12e9-2a9f-3091-d887a544f1a6%40enterprisedb.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 11.01.23 07:11, Peter Smith wrote:
> v9-0003 --> v10-0001
> 
>> I'm not sure if anything is pending for v9-0003, if there is something
>> pending, please post an updated patch for the same.
> 
> Thanks for the reminder. PSA v10.

So this patch changes some sections describing system views to 
refentry's.  What is the reason for that?  refentry's are basically man 
pages; do we want man pages for each system view?

Maybe (*), but then we should also do the same to all the other system 
views, all the system catalogs, everything else.  Just changing a few in 
a single place seems odd.

(*) -- but also maybe not?