Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n5xNk-0007Zz-3V for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 22:06:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n5xNi-0001zK-LZ for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 22:06:42 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n5xNi-0001zA-CC for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 22:06:42 +0000 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n5xNf-0001Oj-B4 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 22:06:41 +0000 Received: (Authenticated sender: adsend@dunslane.net) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8019EE0005; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 22:06:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 17:06:31 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] allow src/tools/msvc/*.bat files to be called from the root of the source tree Content-Language: en-US From: Andrew Dunstan To: Michael Paquier Cc: Anton Voloshin , Pg Hackers References: <2b7a674b-5fb0-d264-75ef-ecc7a31e54f8@postgrespro.ru> <4cdff013-a61e-c6c5-ece9-a403d986c930@dunslane.net> <1a24df33-9802-73c3-c5e0-a88f86a7cbfd@dunslane.net> In-Reply-To: <1a24df33-9802-73c3-c5e0-a88f86a7cbfd@dunslane.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On 1/4/22 08:37, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > On 1/4/22 07:20, Michael Paquier wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 09:48:14AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >>> Seems reasonable. I don't see any reason not to do it for pgbison.bat >>> and pgflex.bat, just for the sake of consistency. >> Yeah, that would close the loop. Andrew, are you planning to check >> and apply this patch? > > > Sure, I can do that. > > done cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com