public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: David Steele <[email protected]>
To: Haibo Yan <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
Cc: Pg Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Return pg_control from pg_backup_stop().
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 07:05:06 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
On 3/17/26 12:16, Haibo Yan wrote:
> I have not read the code yet, so this may already be answered there, but
> I had a question about the proposal itself. This patch protects against
> a missing backup_label, but what about a wrong one? If a user restores a
> backup_label file from a different backup, the existence check alone
> would not detect that. Do we need some consistency check between the
> returned pg_control copy and the backup_label contents, or is the
> intended scope here limited to the “missing file” case only?
Thank you for having a look!
The goal here is only to check for a missing backup_label. The general
problem is that PostgreSQL suggests that removing backup_label might be
a good idea so the user does it:
If you are not restoring from a backup, try removing the file
\"%s/backup_label\"
The user *could* copy a backup_label from another backup and there are
ways we could detect that but I feel that should be material for a
separate patch.
Regards,
-David
view thread (14+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Return pg_control from pg_backup_stop().
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox