public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
To: Peter Smith <[email protected]>
To: David G. Johnston <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 13:09:09 +0100
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHut+Pv5Efz1TLWOLSoFvoyC0mq+s92yFSd534ctWSdjEFtKCw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHut+Pv8Oa7v06hJb3+HzCtM2u-3oHWMdvXVHhvi7ofB83pNbg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAHut+PvjbV5T4H6vk6=hPrU0iZ2KYx39cxS=xJtUL=Mu6H+t6Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CAHut+PsXR6Fq-Ra2VNUA1ZYi6MncB9de40v+tju9JmqZx00t5g@mail.gmail.com>
<CAHut+PtkV5is3+ZpJRmkZQDvdfFiC+BeBS02xQLNk_xRnfs9=A@mail.gmail.com>
<CAHut+PsvkhrByTmR=pY4K28FfUuuM9fQiKdyHHquDRLVBAj5dg@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAHut+Pv=tk6u2MbvqfSdD74HRKpV2QP+e=p0X=g7t6Bf23531w@mail.gmail.com>
<CAKFQuwYtjTbYUs+bLUCk7aszXq_rHx0Fj=0e0fiaVKyDZ9k0Yw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAHut+PvkAp4AS03U08uPWjOoAY+zxD1j43xhRH0TUqzuOMx2BQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAKFQuwa9JtoCBVc6CJb7NC5FqMeEAy_A8X4H8t6kVaw7fz9LTw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAHut+Pv5Efz1TLWOLSoFvoyC0mq+s92yFSd534ctWSdjEFtKCw@mail.gmail.com>
On 23.11.22 09:36, Peter Smith wrote:
> PSA new patches. Now there are 6 of them. If some of the earlier
> patches are agreeable can those ones please be committed? (because I
> think this patch may be susceptible to needing a big rebase if
> anything in those tables changes).
I have committed
v6-0001-Re-order-sections-of-28.4.-Progress-Reporting.patch
v6-0003-Re-order-Table-28.12-Wait-Events-of-type-LWLock.patch
v6-0004-Re-order-Table-28.35-Per-Backend-Statistics-Funct.patch
which seemed to have clear consensus.
v6-0002-Re-order-Table-28.2-Collected-Statistics-Views.patch
This one also seems ok, need a bit more time to look it over.
v6-0005-Cleanup-view-name-hyperlinks-for-Tables-28.1-and-.patch
v6-0006-Remove-all-stats-views-from-the-ToC-of-28.2.patch
I wasn't sure yet whether these had been reviewed yet, sine they were
late additions to the patch series.
view thread (23+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox