Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gum6B-0007DQ-9C for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 22:36:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gum69-0000RP-FL for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 22:36:45 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gum69-0000Pi-4A for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 22:36:45 +0000 Received: from mail-wm1-x343.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::343]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gum66-0008FK-AU for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 22:36:44 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-x343.google.com with SMTP id t200so11253274wmt.0 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 14:36:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=2ndquadrant-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Du3/FKLxLb/tieu36y5FR0inoYVwqttRrW3RX+OO+Zg=; b=EDYFGQ5b6CYlN5ONw+81gmhMP9u0l+6JcDRyXSnfcFs00KOlf4WKnWADl659bLWwXj 3Lm5Sznye2Tnpn/VEFtjShfuCe8K2X8RWjkOjGOc1ho+rVgmv9kGTL2A0TSfTpONnBnm 7DmGcGA4ORTpc+FS1gRDBL79X/X5zw5U7e1j119m3o6oOqiG+Fkxbp0qJsf2nwDvwM6w hZPzOAL+hK9ejk6CfUGB40odcWlxoX+M86Sk2hw7Y9O6m5LCEuHadk8Gm/n07YLgJJKw 2PSiwlaeXswtNafGhK1O+OmqUkFuRkuq5dgvze0/zmZbQ9Rc9r+k5Ak1tElIwTbYkyZw mUdg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Du3/FKLxLb/tieu36y5FR0inoYVwqttRrW3RX+OO+Zg=; b=WmF2qaI/PJ3WrEk5Xbb6EmukUAxnI1Y0NtVILfukwl8W/zfAT2bBeM3DltZ2ldMEcH E0R468j81A5IkjWe0TOdmEAG2lzEw8s6OAIatzUtHzp3qIim9zwmNvcgMpaZsAbpwLUl 3QGK2pzM+3vYqKxU5IeY2Kqah6gsQWIyUGodnsN16w6guY2GGUWuyfYqAAjk2cYrh2/7 7YSuqyi3GjHqasqb8RMUIZgXkYx4jqTf6snCcyrJO2vvPXtJckM1MGwsHIIv1Ug1L5EQ VurOqFwn7uQDsqdneyqbwbgToMIg+N/I3yqcJZ/HZpk6tu9hrVPeg+R5RRrNuINFpE/Q yZ8w== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAubRu5dL1FVPefkHWsyGvVT2w4+VGEuURu1AiiWDHcGlDXn7BU2F s/JApYf0Qtpt+D8HTiiujWJw113/KGvebxGFP9KlVjD1bziCiuPGd6IuJiId1tb92p+ARArO2/2 j6hNQ1diHEPHiiaVQYDeG/qQ/Kbs4yvIAENrt1UW5o2Hv2ofJWHXTeedoqBKpxNmZ/FEps9AclE Cbl7V7DZ3lGQCZTg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3Ial1VGN+wW+AW9Wp4I4mlBSECBRaypx2+eyywy+nJ+CffjNmYzT99oyDktAcQGQZNygaIhFFQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:be04:: with SMTP id o4mr939582wmf.19.1550270200843; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 14:36:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.137.0.17] (ip-86-49-246-90.net.upcbroadband.cz. [86.49.246.90]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u10sm3881440wrr.33.2019.02.15.14.36.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 15 Feb 2019 14:36:39 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs To: Merlin Moncure , Alvaro Herrera Cc: Peter Eisentraut , Tom Lane , Andrew Gierth , Michael Paquier , Robert Haas , Andreas Karlsson , Andres Freund , Thomas Munro , David Fetter , Pg Hackers References: <20190214160209.GA13250@alvherre.pgsql> From: Tomas Vondra Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 23:36:37 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On 2/14/19 8:22 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:02 AM Alvaro Herrera > wrote: >> >> On 2019-Feb-14, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> >>> On 14/02/2019 16:11, Tom Lane wrote: >>>> ... so, have we beaten this topic to death yet? Can we make a decision? >>>> >>>> Personally, I'd be happy with either of the last two patch versions >>>> I posted (that is, either AS [[NOT] MATERIALIZED] or >>>> AS [MATERIALIZE [ON|OFF]] syntax). But we gotta pick something. >>> >>> If we're not really planning to add any more options, I'd register a >>> light vote for MATERIALIZED. It reads easier, seems more grammatically >>> correct, and uses an existing word. >> >> +1 for MATERIALIZED, as I proposed in >> https://postgr.es/m/20170503173305.fetj4tz7kd56tjlr@alvherre.pgsql > > Seconded! > +1 to MATERIALIZED too regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services