Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gu0JB-0000Ek-On for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 19:35:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gu0JA-0004bd-KB for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 19:35:00 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gu0JA-0004bW-9l for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 19:35:00 +0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gu0J7-00082q-8l for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 19:34:59 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AB3DC0467EA; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 19:34:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-112-82.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.112.82]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F143600C4; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 19:34:53 +0000 (UTC) From: Robbie Harwood To: Konstantin Knizhnik , Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> Cc: Andreas Karlsson , Peter Eisentraut , Andres Freund , PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: libpq compression In-Reply-To: References: <20190208071431.skfmpbeclrkpzuac@alap3.anarazel.de> <8d210267-a2fa-662f-b167-0e5991d45dd7@proxel.se> <436d1e08-dd9c-d36a-1c0d-517a70a83cd4@proxel.se> <92435f1b-77aa-4386-4cf1-788b3c3d4365@postgrespro.ru> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 14:34:50 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Wed, 13 Feb 2019 19:34:54 +0000 (UTC) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Konstantin Knizhnik writes: > First of all thank you for attempting to push this patch, because > there is really seems to be some disagreement which blocks progress of > this patch. Unfortunately first reviewer (Robbie Harwood) think that > my approach cause some layering violation and should be done in other > way. Robbie several times suggested me to look "how the buffering in > TLS or GSSAPI works" and do it in similar way. Frankly speaking I do > not see some principle differences differences. Hello, In order to comply with your evident desires, consider this message a courtesy notice that I will no longer be reviewing this patch or accepting future code from you. Thanks, --Robbie --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEA5qc6hnelQjDaHWqJTL5F2qVpEIFAlxkcVoACgkQJTL5F2qV pELF6hAAxnQdEXIh8wvOW1uq4JPZgswH9Nxk+vN6DCVKDZeYXvjKeRhBnxrH7xKj ey5h33JoCXy+M19deN2Ef8Jdd8DK3iPAjrqIgJQ18YYZJb5pcCNq86jKHhnJjogD h9JU3c+GIVFsvqvINZDZOHnVEsk2bKG9+PqblhixZFuUZkkM6ZrmILZCloIUOQJn jFPcyQMIhBkPnIm11fqtJAQtssXPgSpcjtNOCGVhgAJqI5Kc7/jJDyRY/0RrJzqB 2u05o2TMRYkCeQnI4wegAjZP8YDYAacLg0o/ITL24ygljgcIyH9mSGBeLjEBKVxT D4BMpaspz2BHMgNedlCa4eII3NTynLqJJtZmp3kp2G3mLwCPoiiCwED4PsSBE8ss 1yjb3wMBzbvhF+H15PG1Zku3yEkp9m1ZlYbsSQLM98Y02OD9Yw5tnXkxc4bdnQuh gmDYdJ6lFH1s78xD6se34KRE7Fw8sNQ6NM0XX0y2MA5uBnw2fYi49zgePGY49pbg 5kNFjuyOzm6UR3pO+Bku9DfyzQXuXLRpdo+a4ERFxPPPupt69r+BemCEM34t3yLP /aiADr7xgY0kHlojh834whPmIqnZFcP7U3n6HEiPn4F0SlSNDcEynOWPHjT6Vgn+ wPdc7IvyA7uq2g3fluN0MxbFP8oMnmBVVo0cMpeGr6V/2uLU85E= =M6tJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--