From: Robbie Harwood <rharwood@redhat.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>,
 Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] GSSAPI encryption support
In-Reply-To: <20151017021105.GP3685@tamriel.snowman.net>
References: <jlg1tgq1ktm.fsf@thriss.redhat.com>
 <jlgvbaao0sr.fsf@thriss.redhat.com>
 <CAMsr+YE-WaD4kV4vYe0WxQhgD=hJ-EHd7oJ3=ZUF614t1HMPMA@mail.gmail.com>
 <jlg1tcw6owo.fsf@thriss.redhat.com>
 <CAMsr+YH0jamGmOM=mwziYQg=J-0XVp4BosPEv1n+UMaNMj4aMA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20151016133459.GL3685@tamriel.snowman.net>
 <CAMsr+YG1+HQ-V_kdBKkFX+XRV+bND0pJOygns-nbAuHEn2pj2w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20151017021105.GP3685@tamriel.snowman.net>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1
 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 14:01:01 -0400
Message-ID: <jlgwpuin3fm.fsf@thriss.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:

> As for this patch, the reason I've not been as involved (beyond being
> ridiculously busy) is that Michael's environment, which at least appears
> perfectly reasonable (and works with PG unpatched) isn't working.  If we
> can get that working (and I've not looked at what's happening, so I have
> no idea how easy or hard that would be), then I'd be a lot more excited
> to spend time doing review of the patch.

I would also really like to see this fixed.  Unfortunately, I haven't
been able to replicate; I followed Michael's (very nicely written)
writeup and didn't see the issues that Michael did.  The only thing I
know about the problem is that it logs:

> psql: lost synchronization with server: got message type "S", length 22

which unfortunately could be a great many things.  I've said this a
couple times now, but I really do need more information - a traffic
dump, a list of commands that were run, etc.; unfortunately, the surface
here is pretty large, and while I totally am willing to believe there
are bugs in the code I've written, I do not yet see them.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=W9sX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--