Received: from druid.net (root@druid.net [198.96.119.226]) by hub.org
	(8.8.8/8.7.5) with SMTP id MAA11039 for
	<hackers@PostgreSQL.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 1998 12:38:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (1062 bytes) by druid.net
	via sendmail with P:stdio/R:inet_hosts/T:smtp
	(sender: <darcy>) (ident <darcy> using unix)
	id <m0zH9ja-00006FC@druid.net>
	for <hackers@PostgreSQL.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 1998 12:38:14 -0400 (EDT)
	(Smail-3.2.0.101 1997-Dec-17 #1 built 1998-Jul-20)
Message-Id: <m0zH9ja-00006FC@druid.net>
From: darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] open 6.4 items
To: vadim@krs.ru (Vadim Mikheev)
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 12:38:14 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: hackers@PostgreSQL.org
In-Reply-To: <35F7F11C.DE37612@krs.ru> from "Vadim Mikheev" at Sep 10,
	1998 11:32:45 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL0b1]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Thus spake Vadim Mikheev
> > foreign key?(Vadim)
> 
> I just added attributes for primary/unique/foreign keys
> to pg_index & pg_class => dump/reload (or pg_upgrade)...

Hooray!

> Nothing more yet, just catalog changes...

Do you think there would be any problem if I just manually updated those
fields so that I can start testing my Python access stuff?  Do they get
set to some default value at least?

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net>   |  Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.