Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F9811337C41 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 15:12:41 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 51212-02-4 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 19:12:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from acidenitrix.villemain.org (acidenitrix.villemain.org [91.121.90.165]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EAF61337C83 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 15:10:27 -0400 (AST) Received: from 89-158-241-48.rev.dartybox.com ([89.158.241.48] helo=DimIMac.local) by acidenitrix.villemain.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PmWTE-0004P0-SB; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 20:09:56 +0100 Received: by DimIMac.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 49ED41921CC4; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 20:09:51 +0100 (CET) From: Dimitri Fontaine To: Robert Haas Cc: Tom Lane , Simon Riggs , Aidan Van Dyk , Heikki Linnakangas , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1 Organization: 2ndQuadrant References: <1295127631.3282.100.camel@ebony> <4D397FE4.2020709@enterprisedb.com> <1295616270.1803.10799.camel@ebony> <4D39A761.1020105@enterprisedb.com> <1295629194.1803.11957.camel@ebony> <14761.1295633002@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1295703074.1803.19835.camel@ebony> <1297096419.1770.5824.camel@ebony> <21347.1297100595@sss.pgh.pa.us> User-Mail-Address: dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 20:09:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Robert Haas's message of "Mon, 7 Feb 2011 12:55:11 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201102/488 X-Sequence-Number: 181277 Robert Haas writes: > done in the time available is another thing entirely. I do NOT want > to still be working on the items for this CommitFest in June - that's > about when I'd like to be releasing beta3. Except that's not how we work here. You want to change that with respect to the release management process and schedule (or lack thereof). Tradition and current practice say you need to reach consensus to be able to bypass compromising. Good luck with that. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support