public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Messages from [email protected]

Re: [BUG?] check_exclusion_or_unique_constraint false negative
  2025-03-12 01:05 UTC  Mihail Nikalayeu <[email protected]>

Re: Why doesn't GiST VACUUM require a super-exclusive lock, like nbtree VACUUM?
  2025-03-09 12:44 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Why does exec_simple_query requires 2 snapshots
  2025-03-08 09:51 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2025-03-07 22:58 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [BUG?] check_exclusion_or_unique_constraint false negative
  2025-02-11 23:39 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Why doesn't GiST VACUUM require a super-exclusive lock, like nbtree VACUUM?
  2025-02-08 13:46 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Why doesn't GiST VACUUM require a super-exclusive lock, like nbtree VACUUM?
  2025-02-05 10:11 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Why doesn't GiST VACUUM require a super-exclusive lock, like nbtree VACUUM?
  2025-02-05 10:04 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2025-02-04 01:38 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: new commitfest transition guidance
  2025-02-03 16:57 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2025-01-30 01:00 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [BUG?] check_exclusion_or_unique_constraint false negative
  2025-01-20 21:35 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Issue with markers in isolation tester? Or not?
  2025-01-19 20:55 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Issue with markers in isolation tester? Or not?
  2025-01-19 18:26 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2025-01-18 14:18 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Issue with markers in isolation tester? Or not?
  2025-01-18 13:03 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
  2025-01-18 12:59 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Issue with markers in isolation tester? Or not?
  2025-01-15 00:39 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Issue with markers in isolation tester? Or not?
  2025-01-14 11:16 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Issue with markers in isolation tester? Or not?
  2025-01-13 23:33 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
  2025-01-13 21:58 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Conflict Detection and Resolution
  2025-01-13 17:31 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Issue with markers in isolation tester? Or not?
  2025-01-13 01:02 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Strange assertion in procarray.c
  2025-01-12 16:40 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Why doesn't GiST VACUUM require a super-exclusive lock, like nbtree VACUUM?
  2025-01-10 17:06 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Why doesn't GiST VACUUM require a super-exclusive lock, like nbtree VACUUM?
  2025-01-10 01:09 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Why doesn't GiST VACUUM require a super-exclusive lock, like nbtree VACUUM?
  2025-01-09 21:00 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2025-01-08 02:12 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2025-01-06 13:36 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2025-01-01 17:53 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2025-01-01 16:16 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Proposal to Enable/Disable Index using ALTER INDEX (with patch)
  2025-01-01 14:58 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Proposal to Enable/Disable Index using ALTER INDEX (with patch)
  2024-12-30 20:48 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Proposal to Enable/Disable Index using ALTER INDEX (with patch)
  2024-12-30 16:08 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
  2024-12-26 13:56 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2024-12-25 15:14 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2024-12-24 19:39 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2024-12-24 13:06 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
  2024-12-24 12:57 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2024-12-21 18:00 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2024-12-17 23:29 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: bt_index_parent_check and concurrently build indexes
  2024-12-15 18:43 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Windows UTF8 system locale
  2024-12-15 17:43 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

[BUG] pgbench nested \if conditions incorrectly processed
  2024-12-15 14:12 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: bt_index_parent_check and concurrently build indexes
  2024-12-12 23:59 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: bt_index_parent_check and concurrently build indexes
  2024-12-10 12:17 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2024-12-09 20:53 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

bt_index_parent_check and concurrently build indexes
  2024-12-09 20:51 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2024-12-02 01:39 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Strange assertion in procarray.c
  2024-11-29 11:55 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
  2024-11-28 21:29 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Strange assertion in procarray.c
  2024-11-28 20:04 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Strange assertion in procarray.c
  2024-11-27 09:50 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Strange assertion in procarray.c
  2024-11-27 02:27 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Strange assertion in procarray.c
  2024-11-25 19:38 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [BUG?] check_exclusion_or_unique_constraint false negative
  2024-11-23 16:20 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
  2024-11-14 23:38 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2024-11-12 15:00 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication
  2024-10-30 11:31 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication
  2024-10-29 10:40 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication
  2024-10-25 10:20 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [BUG?] check_exclusion_or_unique_constraint false negative
  2024-10-21 17:06 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Conflict Detection and Resolution
  2024-10-21 01:14 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Conflict Detection and Resolution
  2024-09-19 15:31 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2024-09-08 15:18 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: PATCH: Issue with set_indexsafe_procflags in ReindexRelationConcurrently
  2024-09-06 11:39 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

PATCH: Issue with set_indexsafe_procflags in ReindexRelationConcurrently
  2024-09-06 11:27 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2024-09-01 21:19 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
  2024-08-24 15:52 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [BUG?] check_exclusion_or_unique_constraint false negative
  2024-08-16 13:31 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Conflict detection and logging in logical replication
  2024-08-16 11:46 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
  2024-08-16 10:22 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Conflict detection and logging in logical replication
  2024-08-14 14:15 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Conflict detection and logging in logical replication
  2024-08-13 11:32 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [BUG?] check_exclusion_or_unique_constraint false negative
  2024-08-12 11:11 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Conflict detection and logging in logical replication
  2024-08-09 11:45 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2024-08-08 13:53 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
  2024-08-07 09:30 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [BUG?] check_exclusion_or_unique_constraint false negative
  2024-08-05 11:11 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [BUG?] check_exclusion_or_unique_constraint false negative
  2024-08-02 17:08 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [BUG?] check_exclusion_or_unique_constraint false negative
  2024-08-01 09:25 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [BUG?] check_exclusion_or_unique_constraint false negative
  2024-07-31 20:57 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [BUG?] check_exclusion_or_unique_constraint false negative
  2024-07-24 20:01 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [BUG?] check_exclusion_or_unique_constraint false negative
  2024-07-21 15:27 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

[BUG?] check_exclusion_or_unique_constraint false negative
  2024-07-14 18:01 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
  2024-06-25 15:57 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
  2024-06-25 11:47 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
  2024-06-21 09:31 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
  2024-06-17 17:00 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
  2024-06-14 13:30 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
  2024-06-14 10:06 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: race condition in pg_class
  2024-06-12 20:02 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: race condition in pg_class
  2024-06-12 13:02 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
  2024-06-11 11:00 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2024-06-11 08:58 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2024-05-09 13:00 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2024-05-07 20:23 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2024-05-07 12:35 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2024-05-05 23:37 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2024-05-04 15:51 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2024-03-07 18:36 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2024-02-21 11:36 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2024-02-21 08:35 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2024-02-20 23:33 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2024-02-01 16:06 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2024-01-09 17:00 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2024-01-04 12:45 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2023-12-25 14:12 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2023-12-21 13:14 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2023-12-20 16:53 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2023-12-20 16:18 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2023-12-20 09:56 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2023-12-17 20:14 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
  2023-12-15 19:07 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Replace known_assigned_xids_lck by memory barrier
  2023-09-05 23:56 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Replace known_assigned_xids_lck by memory barrier
  2023-08-16 19:29 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Replace known_assigned_xids_lck by memory barrier
  2023-08-16 15:30 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Replace known_assigned_xids_lck by memory barrier
  2023-08-15 10:29 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Replace known_assigned_xids_lck by memory barrier
  2023-03-19 09:43 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: BUG: Postgres 14 + vacuum_defer_cleanup_age + FOR UPDATE + UPDATE
  2023-02-04 12:21 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: BUG: Postgres 14 + vacuum_defer_cleanup_age + FOR UPDATE + UPDATE
  2023-01-22 10:49 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: BUG: Postgres 14 + vacuum_defer_cleanup_age + FOR UPDATE + UPDATE
  2023-01-07 18:06 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: BUG: Postgres 14 + vacuum_defer_cleanup_age + FOR UPDATE + UPDATE
  2023-01-06 11:45 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: BUG: Postgres 14 + vacuum_defer_cleanup_age + FOR UPDATE + UPDATE
  2023-01-05 21:39 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

BUG: Postgres 14 + vacuum_defer_cleanup_age + FOR UPDATE + UPDATE
  2023-01-05 13:12 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Data loss on logical replication, 12.12 to 14.5, ALTER SUBSCRIPTION
  2023-01-03 15:20 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Data loss on logical replication, 12.12 to 14.5, ALTER SUBSCRIPTION
  2023-01-03 08:43 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Data loss on logical replication, 12.12 to 14.5, ALTER SUBSCRIPTION
  2022-12-28 11:22 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Data loss on logical replication, 12.12 to 14.5, ALTER SUBSCRIPTION
  2022-12-27 12:19 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Data loss on logical replication, 12.12 to 14.5, ALTER SUBSCRIPTION
  2022-12-26 15:19 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Data loss on logical replication, 12.12 to 14.5, ALTER SUBSCRIPTION
  2022-12-26 14:28 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Slow standby snapshot
  2022-11-29 21:22 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Slow standby snapshot
  2022-11-28 07:19 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Slow standby snapshot
  2022-11-22 21:53 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Slow standby snapshot
  2022-11-20 13:55 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Slow standby snapshot
  2022-11-20 13:50 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Slow standby snapshot
  2022-11-20 13:45 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Slow standby snapshot
  2022-11-16 12:23 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Slow standby snapshot
  2022-09-16 16:08 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Slow standby snapshot
  2022-08-07 19:28 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Slow standby snapshot
  2022-07-29 17:24 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Slow standby snapshot
  2022-07-19 21:12 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Slow standby snapshot
  2022-07-02 17:32 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Any sense to get rid of known_assigned_xids_lck?
  2022-06-13 08:30 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: CPU time for pg_stat_statement
  2022-06-08 07:15 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: CPU time for pg_stat_statement
  2022-05-20 21:32 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: CPU time for pg_stat_statement
  2022-05-20 21:21 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

CPU time for pg_stat_statement
  2022-05-20 18:50 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby
  2022-03-31 23:58 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby
  2022-03-31 23:57 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Slow standby snapshot
  2022-03-31 23:18 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby
  2022-03-29 16:51 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby
  2022-03-29 11:55 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby
  2022-03-29 11:52 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Patch proposal - parameter to limit amount of FPW because of hint bits per second
  2022-03-24 08:03 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby
  2022-03-22 13:52 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Patch proposal - parameter to limit amount of FPW because of hint bits per second
  2022-03-22 12:07 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Patch proposal - parameter to limit amount of FPW because of hint bits per second
  2022-03-21 07:58 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Patch proposal - parameter to limit amount of FPW because of hint bits per second
  2022-03-20 19:43 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Slow standby snapshot
  2022-02-21 07:12 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: BufferAlloc: don't take two simultaneous locks
  2022-02-06 16:34 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: BufferAlloc: don't take two simultaneous locks
  2022-01-30 17:27 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby
  2022-01-26 07:49 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby
  2022-01-24 07:33 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

[PATCH v9 3/3] docs
  2022-01-23 17:47 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

[PATCH v9 2/3] test
  2022-01-23 17:47 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby
  2022-01-15 17:39 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

[PATCH v9 1/3] code
  2022-01-15 13:21 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Windows vs recovery tests
  2022-01-12 21:37 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Stream replication test fails of cfbot/windows server 2019
  2022-01-12 10:51 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Slow standby snapshot
  2021-11-22 09:05 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Slow standby snapshot
  2021-11-21 18:58 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Slow standby snapshot
  2021-11-14 12:09 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Slow standby snapshot
  2021-11-09 21:15 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby
  2021-11-09 19:05 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby
  2021-11-09 16:00 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby
  2021-11-09 15:58 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby
  2021-11-05 16:51 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Slow standby snapshot
  2021-10-02 11:38 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby
  2021-09-29 22:09 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Slow standby snapshot
  2021-08-09 21:45 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Slow standby snapshot
  2021-08-03 19:23 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Slow standby snapshot
  2021-08-02 21:07 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Logical replication error "no record found" /* shouldn't happen */
  2021-07-24 10:26 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Slow standby snapshot
  2021-07-11 13:51 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Slow standby snapshot
  2021-06-13 17:12 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby
  2021-05-13 21:37 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby
  2021-05-12 20:12 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby
  2021-05-10 13:05 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby
  2021-05-07 09:46 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Thoughts on "killed tuples" index hint bits support on standby
  2021-02-10 23:32 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby
  2021-02-10 23:27 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Thoughts on "killed tuples" index hint bits support on standby
  2021-02-02 20:31 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Thoughts on "killed tuples" index hint bits support on standby
  2021-02-01 21:19 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Thoughts on "killed tuples" index hint bits support on standby
  2021-01-30 17:11 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Thoughts on "killed tuples" index hint bits support on standby
  2021-01-28 18:15 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: Thoughts on "killed tuples" index hint bits support on standby
  2021-01-27 19:30 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby
  2021-01-27 19:27 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

Re: [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby
  2021-01-22 00:56 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>

[PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby
  2021-01-18 20:30 UTC  Michail Nikolaev <[email protected]>


200+ results

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox