agora inbox for [email protected]help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Messages from [email protected] Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE 2006-01-16 20:24 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Unsplitting btree index leaf pages 2005-12-24 20:47 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Re: Which qsort is used 2005-12-22 21:58 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Re: Which qsort is used 2005-12-22 00:43 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Shared locking in slru.c 2005-12-02 10:09 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Alternative variable length structure 2005-09-09 11:07 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples 2005-09-03 08:59 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples 2005-09-02 23:25 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Must be owner to truncate? 2005-08-24 12:29 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations 2005-05-31 17:58 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: WAL replay failure after file truncation(?) 2005-05-26 22:04 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations 2005-05-25 19:24 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: WAL replay failure after file truncation(?) 2005-05-25 19:24 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Bitmap scan cost model (was Re: bitmap scans, btree scans, and tid order) 2005-05-18 12:35 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations 2005-05-18 11:50 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Learning curves and such 2005-05-17 21:47 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry) 2005-05-17 21:21 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: pgFoundry 2005-05-17 21:02 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: BTW, if anyone wants to work on it... 2005-05-17 20:47 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations 2005-05-17 20:22 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Best way to scan on-disk bitmaps 2005-05-15 19:22 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Views, views, views! (long) 2005-05-15 19:21 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP 2005-03-14 12:40 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Group-count estimation statistics 2005-02-01 15:29 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Group-count estimation statistics 2005-01-31 19:35 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Refactoring 2005-01-31 11:19 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Group-count estimation statistics 2005-01-31 11:08 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*) 2005-01-25 07:33 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Autotuning Group Commit 2005-01-24 11:12 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: ARC patent 2005-01-21 14:42 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Refactoring 2005-01-19 17:57 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*) 2005-01-16 19:49 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Shared row locking 2004-12-30 23:17 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Shared row locking 2004-12-30 17:41 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Bgwriter behavior 2004-12-30 00:15 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Shared row locking 2004-12-30 00:14 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Shared row locking 2004-12-30 00:12 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Updateable Views? 2004-08-10 00:13 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Trapping QUERY_CANCELED: yes, no, maybe? 2004-08-06 23:15 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Trapping QUERY_CANCELED: yes, no, maybe? 2004-08-06 22:20 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Quick question regarding tablespaces 2004-08-06 14:12 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: More vacuum.c refactoring 2004-08-06 14:02 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> dbt2-pgsql on OSDL 2004-07-06 17:58 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Another unpleasant surprise using inheritance 2004-06-11 17:24 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: More vacuum.c refactoring 2004-06-11 00:00 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> More vacuum.c refactoring 2004-06-10 20:08 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: SELECT * FROM <table> LIMIT 1; is really slow 2004-06-01 12:39 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: SELECT * FROM <table> LIMIT 1; is really slow 2004-06-01 12:37 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: SELECT * FROM <table> LIMIT 1; is really slow 2004-05-28 18:29 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: SELECT * FROM <table> LIMIT 1; is really slow 2004-05-27 19:52 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: SELECT * FROM <table> LIMIT 1; is really slow 2004-05-27 18:07 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: New horology failure 2004-05-24 16:02 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: zero-column table behavior 2004-05-24 16:00 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC? 2004-05-05 18:02 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] Number of pages in a random sample 2004-04-29 16:56 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: btbulkdelete 2004-04-28 09:16 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: btbulkdelete 2004-04-26 16:24 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> btbulkdelete 2004-04-25 21:34 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Number of pages in a random sample (was: query slows down with more accurate stats) 2004-04-25 20:26 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Tuple sampling 2004-04-19 10:30 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: query slows down with more accurate stats 2004-04-16 22:26 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: query slows down with more accurate stats 2004-04-16 10:16 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: query slows down with more accurate stats 2004-04-15 23:32 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [GENERAL] Large DB 2004-04-03 01:09 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [GENERAL] Large DB 2004-04-03 00:40 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [GENERAL] Large DB 2004-04-02 21:53 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Large DB 2004-04-02 18:05 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Large DB 2004-04-02 15:17 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Large DB 2004-04-01 10:22 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: PostgreSQL block size vs. LVM2 stripe width 2004-03-29 22:42 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: PostgreSQL block size vs. LVM2 stripe width 2004-03-27 22:03 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [PATCHES] log_line_info 2004-03-10 10:54 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Summary of Changes since last release (7.4.1) 2004-02-19 13:55 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [GENERAL] Transaction Question 2003-12-11 15:14 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Transaction Question 2003-12-04 20:27 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Transaction Question 2003-12-04 16:55 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] Index creation takes for ever 2003-12-02 09:24 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] Index creation takes for ever 2003-12-01 18:17 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: logical column position 2003-11-20 13:33 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Defaults for GUC variables (was Re: pg_ctl reports succes when start fails) 2003-10-28 11:38 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] Cannot dump/restore text value \N 2003-10-08 18:11 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] Cannot dump/restore text value \N 2003-10-08 15:24 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] Cannot dump/restore text value \N 2003-10-08 09:31 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Cannot dump/restore text value \N 2003-10-06 00:01 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Cannot dump/restore text value \N 2003-10-05 22:29 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY 2003-10-01 18:02 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: osdl-dbt3 run results - puzzled by the execution 2003-09-24 09:14 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: osdl-dbt3 run results - puzzled by the execution plans 2003-09-19 15:08 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Is it a memory leak in PostgreSQL 7.4beta? 2003-09-10 13:11 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: plpgsql doesn't coerce boolean expressions to boolean 2003-09-09 14:56 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] Index creation takes for ever 2003-09-08 11:27 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] Index creation takes for ever 2003-09-07 17:35 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] Index creation takes for ever 2003-09-07 17:16 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] Index creation takes for ever 2003-09-07 08:33 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] Buglist 2003-08-22 16:54 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] Buglist 2003-08-22 16:20 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Buglist 2003-08-22 14:09 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Buglist 2003-08-22 10:53 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Decent VACUUM (was: Buglist) 2003-08-21 22:24 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Buglist 2003-08-21 21:43 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Decent VACUUM (was: Buglist) 2003-08-21 21:33 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [SQL] "SELECT IN" Still Broken in 7.4b 2003-08-21 21:18 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Decent VACUUM (was: Buglist) 2003-08-21 20:55 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL" bullet list 2003-08-21 19:30 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL" bullet list 2003-08-21 13:05 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Again on index correlation 2003-08-20 19:21 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Correlation in cost_index() 2003-08-20 17:57 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Correlation in cost_index() 2003-08-09 00:27 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Correlation in cost_index() 2003-08-08 23:48 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Correlation in cost_index() 2003-08-08 23:18 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Correlation in cost_index() 2003-08-08 21:23 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Correlation in cost_index() 2003-08-08 16:31 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection 2003-07-31 10:38 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> 'out of tree' compile (was: Two weeks to feature freeze) 2003-06-27 09:16 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] MARKED_FOR_UPDATE && XMAX_COMMITTED == XMAX_INVALID ? 2003-06-12 13:59 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> MARKED_FOR_UPDATE && XMAX_COMMITTED == XMAX_INVALID ? 2003-06-11 07:21 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Static snapshot data 2003-05-23 18:49 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: vacuum analyze corrupts database 2003-05-23 18:05 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Static snapshot data 2003-05-23 10:17 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Static snapshot data 2003-05-16 17:12 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [PATCHES] Static snapshot data 2003-05-13 19:57 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Static snapshot data 2003-05-12 06:53 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Static snapshot data 2003-05-09 16:10 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> comp.databases.postgresql.patches not working 2003-05-02 09:27 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Separate build directory 2003-04-05 14:13 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Build error in cvs head 2003-04-04 19:17 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: GROUP BY + join regression in 7.3 2003-04-01 08:03 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Nested transactions: low level stuff 2003-03-19 19:36 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Nested transactions: low level stuff 2003-03-19 17:24 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Nested transactions: low level stuff 2003-03-19 07:28 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Nested transactions 2003-03-18 09:32 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [SQL] What's wrong with this group by clause? 2003-03-13 15:16 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Hard problem with concurrency 2003-02-25 00:37 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Brain dump: btree collapsing 2003-02-14 15:53 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Offering tuned config files 2003-02-14 12:41 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Offering tuned config files 2003-02-14 11:58 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Incremental backup 2003-02-14 10:28 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Suggestion for aggregate function 2003-01-19 18:14 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Suggestion for aggregate function 2003-01-17 22:16 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Vacuum verbose output? 2003-01-15 09:42 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Upgrading rant. 2003-01-07 10:39 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Upgrading rant. 2003-01-07 10:18 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: pg_dump.options.diff 2003-01-02 10:52 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: MOVE strangeness 2002-12-30 18:50 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: PageGetMaxOffsetNumber 2002-12-16 08:58 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: nested transactions 2002-12-04 16:54 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: nested transactions 2002-11-29 20:10 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: nested transactions 2002-11-29 17:03 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: nested transactions 2002-11-29 11:23 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: next value expression 2002-11-28 15:34 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: nested transactions 2002-11-28 14:51 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> next value expression 2002-11-27 15:29 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: nested transactions 2002-11-27 15:11 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: RI_FKey_check: foreign key constraint blocks parallel 2002-11-15 22:11 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: BTree free pages again 2002-10-23 14:19 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> contrib/fixchar (Was: Large databases, performance) 2002-10-10 13:30 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [pgsql-performance] Large databases, performance 2002-10-09 18:09 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Large databases, performance 2002-10-09 08:00 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Large databases, performance 2002-10-07 15:22 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Large databases, performance 2002-10-07 14:10 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [SQL] [GENERAL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP 2002-10-05 09:58 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Correlation in cost_index() 2002-10-04 17:57 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Return of INSTEAD rules 2002-10-04 16:00 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Correlation in cost_index() 2002-10-04 15:13 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Correlation in cost_index() 2002-10-03 17:39 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] Large databases, performance 2002-10-03 16:53 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Large databases, performance 2002-10-03 16:44 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Correlation in cost_index() 2002-10-03 16:27 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Correlation in cost_index() 2002-10-03 15:58 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Correlation in cost_index() 2002-10-03 10:40 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Correlation in cost_index() 2002-10-03 07:28 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Correlation in cost_index() 2002-10-03 07:09 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Correlation in cost_index() 2002-10-02 19:52 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: (Fwd) Re: Any Oracle 9 users? A test please... 2002-09-30 21:04 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS? 2002-09-29 19:26 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS? 2002-09-28 20:38 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS? 2002-09-26 08:14 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [SQL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP 2002-09-25 06:54 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [GENERAL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP 2002-09-24 09:44 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [GENERAL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP 2002-09-24 09:37 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [GENERAL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP 2002-09-24 09:16 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [SQL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP 2002-09-24 08:33 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [SQL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP 2002-09-23 19:02 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [SQL] Monitoring a Query 2002-09-23 17:01 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Physical sites handling large data 2002-09-16 19:33 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: 7.2 - 7.3 activity 2002-09-11 15:38 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Proposal: Solving the "Return proper effected tuple count from complex commands [return]" issue 2002-09-11 09:35 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: source code indexer 2002-08-30 19:28 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Page type 2002-08-19 09:28 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Open 7.3 items: heap tuple header 2002-08-16 22:35 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: Open 7.3 items: heap tuple header 2002-08-16 15:58 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> OSDB (was: Heap tuple header issues) 2002-08-07 16:21 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Heap tuple header issues 2002-08-07 14:16 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Heap tuple header, vacation 2002-07-21 21:08 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: HEAP_MOVED_IN or HEAP_MOVED_OFF? 2002-07-18 14:56 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: OID suppression issues 2002-07-17 08:35 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: HeapTuple header changes cause core dumps in CVS tip 2002-07-15 23:38 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] please help on query 2002-07-11 18:44 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] please help on query 2002-07-11 16:47 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> effective_cache_size 2002-07-11 12:25 UTC Manfred Koizar <[email protected]> 200+ results
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox